arXiv AI

DEEPCHART: How Far are LLMs from Faithful Data-Science Chart Generation?

DEEPCHART is a new benchmark that evaluates large language models (LLMs) on faithful data‑science chart generation. It contains 1,482 expert‑annotated instances from scientific papers, financial filings, and ecosystem reports, and assesses chart creation through an Extract–Reason–Visualize pipeline. Experiments show that while LLMs can produce visually plausible charts, they frequently hallucinate data at the extraction and reasoning stages, especially in long, noisy, and multimodal contexts.

arXiv AI
Oct 2

Faithful Chart Generation for Multimodal Deep Research: Frame-Evidence Co-Adaptation

The paper introduces Frame‑Evidence Co‑Adaptation (FECA), an evidence‑adaptive visual planning framework for generating analytical charts in multimodal deep research. FECA treats chart generation as an iterative interaction between visual frames and retrieved evidence, allowing frames to be guided, revised, or dropped based on evidence availability. Experiments on 100 real‑world research topics demonstrate that FECA improves numerical fidelity while maintaining report quality and chart utility.

By Yuxin Yue, Yingchen Zhang, Ruqing Zhang, Jiafeng Guo, Maarten de Rijke, Xueqi Cheng
arXiv AI
Oct 1

ChartDensity-Bench: Benchmarking MLLMs for Numerical Data Reconstruction under Visual Density

ChartDensity-Bench is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on their ability to reconstruct structured numerical data from scientific charts that vary in visual density. The benchmark uses charts paired with source-level ground-truth data and systematically changes the number of simultaneously presented charts (k = 1, 3, 6, 9) to assess how density affects reconstruction performance. A multi‑dimensional evaluation framework measures structural reliability, reconstruction completeness, parseability, and numerical fidelity, revealing that numerical reconstruction generally worsens as visual density increases, with varying degrees of degradation across different models.

By Xinhe Wu, Yadong Jin
arXiv AI
Jun 10

ChartAgent: A Multimodal Agent for Visually Grounded Reasoning in Complex Chart Question Answering

arXiv:2510. 04514v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent multimodal LLMs have shown promise in chart-based visual question answering, but their performance declines sharply on unannotated charts-those requiring precise visual interpretation rather than relying on textual shortcuts.

By Rachneet Kaur, Nishan Srishankar, Zhen Zeng, Sumitra Ganesh, Manuela Veloso
arXiv AI
Aug 5

ChartAnno: Evaluating MLLMs for Chart Annotation Generation

arXiv:2608. 03464v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have made significant progress in chart understanding, generation, and editing, but their ability to annotate existing charts remains underexplored.

By Zhenghan Chen, Zekai Shao, Lidan Tan, Xin Lin, Xingchen Zeng, Yi Shan, Ziyue Lin, Xiaoliang Fu, Xinyuan Liu, Yuetong Guo, Fen Wang, Bongshin Lee, Siming Chen
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 4

ChartAnno: Evaluating MLLMs for Chart Annotation Generation

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have made significant progress in chart understanding, generation, and editing, but their ability to annotate existing charts remains underexplored. Annotating charts is a common yet challenging communicative task, requiring models to infer intended messages, interpret chart semantics, and place appropriate textual or graphical elements.