arXiv:2609.38109v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: The attention operation is naively position invariant. However, positional information is fundamental to natural language, and therefore a variety of...
By Cutter Dawes, Nick Alonso, Tom Figliolia, Beren Millidge
arXiv:2606. 03398v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Formal languages have proven to be effective conduits to understand the inner mechanisms of transformers.
By Nishit Singh
The paper demonstrates that Large Language Models, despite their non‑linear components, exhibit a fundamental linearity property: when inputs from two distinct text streams are linearly combined, the model outputs a superposition of the individual next‑token distributions. This "Superposition Linearity Hypothesis" appears to be an intrinsic feature of the Transformer architecture, tends to weaken during pretraining, but can be largely restored with lightweight fine‑tuning. The authors also present a guided decoding method that separates the superposed outputs, allowing two coherent continuations to be generated from a single forward pass.
By Pavel Tikhonov, Anton Korznikov, Matvey Mikhalchuk, Nikita Dragunov, Temurbek Rahmatullaev, Polina Druzhinina, Anton Razzhigaev, Ivan Oseledets, Elena Tutubalina
arXiv:2607. 15893v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While the internal mechanisms of autoregressive (AR) transformers have been studied extensively, much less is known about diffusion language models (DLMs), an emerging alternative that generates text by iterative denoising.
By Andy Catruna, Emilian Radoi
arXiv:2606. 17522v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep neural networks are widely believed to derive their expressive power from their ability to form \textbf{hierarchical representations}, capturing progressively more abstract and compositional features across layers.
By Vinoth Nandakumar, Qiang Qu, Pramod Thebe, Sakshi Khachariya, Tongliang Liu
arXiv:2502. 20681v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Transformers may exhibit two-stage training dynamics during the real-world training process.
By Zixuan Gong, Shijia Li, Yong Liu, Jiaye Teng
arXiv:2608. 06111v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Positional embeddings (PE) in Transformers encode token distance and order but are largely agnostic to \textit{syntactic structure}.
By Haris Riaz, Hyungji Kim, Mihai Surdeanu
The paper investigates why current byte‑level language models, which use a hierarchical structure that down‑samples to words and then upsamples back to bytes, struggle with precise character manipulation. Experiments show that pure byte‑level models outperform hierarchical variants on character‑level tasks, and that byte‑level attention is the key component driving this advantage. The study explains the trade‑off between computational efficiency and fine‑grained character understanding in hierarchical byte models.
By Lukas Edman, Alexander Fraser
arXiv:2505. 15548v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Autoregressive transformer language models frequently exhibit training instability when trained on long sequences, particularly under low-precision arithmetic.
By Suvadeep Hajra
arXiv:2608. 13578v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Transformer architectures rely on dense self-attention to model long-range dependencies, but this mechanism exhibits quadratic complexity with respect to sequence length.
By Rachid Arezki
arXiv:2607. 18570v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Discourse relations provide document structure, critical to language understanding and enabling language model performance and ethicality.
By Abhidip Bhattacharyya, Shira Wein
arXiv:2603. 06591v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Transformers frequently allocate disproportionate attention to specific tokens, a phenomenon known as attention sinks.
By Runyu Peng, Ruixiao Li, Mingshu Chen, Yunhua Zhou, Qipeng Guo, Xipeng Qiu, Yucheng Lu, Chen Zhao