The paper introduces Direct Rooftop Solar Prediction (DRSP), an end‑to‑end method that estimates rooftop solar potential directly from satellite images and regional sunlight data, bypassing explicit geometric reconstruction. DRSP does not predict roof orientation, slope, height, or DSMs, and therefore requires no geometric intermediate supervision. The authors built a large‑scale dataset from the Google Solar API, comprising about 60K rooftops in the U.S. Midwest and 87K in Texas, and evaluated how factors such as geographic training distribution, model depth, image resolution, and sunlight conditioning affect performance.
By Joshua Lee
arXiv:2609.13013v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Flat roofs are among the most influential components of the building envelope, governing both structural performance and thermal efficiency, and thereb...
By Samuel Dunthorne, Hashim A. Hashim
The paper introduces a deep‑learning framework that estimates building age using widely available multi‑source geospatial data, including satellite imagery, Digital Surface Models, and building footprints. It employs a pretrained backbone with fine‑tuning adapters, raster‑derived and property‑derived fusion modules, and a pyramid decoder with Cosine‑guided Mixture‑of‑Experts for pixel‑level predictions, while instance‑level predictions use attention pooling and Property‑Conditional Adaptive Instance Normalization. A Temporal Ordinal Constraint Loss enforces the natural ordering of building ages, and the authors provide a new Hong Kong building age benchmark along with open‑source code and datasets.
By Jialu Sui, Hongsheng Zhang, Rui Liu, Jing Ling, Ruisheng Wang, Hao Wu, Gang Chen
arXiv:2607. 07292v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Accurately estimating urban carbon emissions is critical for sustainable urban planning, yet many existing approaches remain difficult to apply consistently across cities due to data-source heterogeneity and the lack of fine-grained semantic-temporal context in remote sensing data.
By Zeru Yang, Fang-Ying Gong, Steve H. L. Yim, Chau Yuen
arXiv:2607. 23024v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: High-resolution satellite imagery is the backbone of good land-cover classification, and without that, environmental monitoring, urban planning, and sustainable resource management all fall short.
By Atiq Ur Rehman, Joseph Michael Donovan
DeepC4 is a deep learning-based spatial disaggregation method that uses local census statistics as cluster-level constraints and incorporates multiple conditional label relationships in a multitask learning framework. Applied to Rwandan urban morphology, it achieves macro‑F1 scores of 0.63, 0.78, and 0.45 for roof, wall, and height prediction, respectively, and estimates national dwelling and occupant counts within about 1.1% error compared to census records. The approach outperforms existing GEM and METEOR methods and covers 32‑49% more 500‑meter grid pixels across provinces.
By Joshua Dimasaka, Christian Gei{\ss}, Emily So
The paper presents a framework that enhances deep‑learning tree‑cover mapping in New South Wales by fusing multiple imagery sources and normalizing image quality. It introduces an image‑composition technique that removes defects and a prediction‑fusion method that reduces reliance on any single image, together cutting errors by 38.2 % and 53.6 % respectively. Label transfer across diverse imagery further boosts data efficiency, yielding error reductions of 28.1 %–76.2 % and a 13‑fold decrease in performance variability across dates.
By Kal Backman, Jared Wood, Adam Roff
arXiv:2607. 04190v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Global reanalysis products such as ERA5-Land provide spatially complete weather fields but at resolutions too coarse for local applications, particularly in mountainous regions where temperature can vary by several degrees over short distances.
By Francisco Passos
OpenCVL is a large, open dataset for fine-grained cross-view localization, comprising 617,388 ground‑aerial image pairs from 41 European cities. It blends high‑end sensor data with diverse in‑the‑wild images and includes a curation framework to correct pose annotations, enabling reliable evaluation. The dataset also offers cross‑area and snowy test sets to probe generalization, and experiments show that adding noisy in‑the‑wild data improves model performance on clean tests.
By Zimin Xia, Mubariz Zaffar, Junsheng Fu, Alexandre Alahi, Julian F. P. Kooij
arXiv:2604. 13240v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Mapping the spatial distribution of species is essential for conservation policy and invasive species management.
By Augustin de la Brosse, Damien Garreau, Thomas Houet, Thomas Corpetti
The paper compares classical machine learning algorithms—such as Logistic Regression, SVM, Random Forest, XGBoost, and CatBoost—with Tabular Deep Learning models (TabNet, FT-Transformer, TabTransformer, TabSeq, and 1D CNNs) for urban land cover classification using a UCI dataset derived from high‑resolution aerial imagery. It evaluates performance across nine land cover classes, addressing challenges like high dimensionality, heterogeneous features, and class imbalance by applying weighted cross‑entropy loss for deep models and measuring accuracy, macro‑precision, macro‑recall, macro‑F1, AUC‑ROC, and confusion matrices. Results indicate that while tree ensembles remain strong baselines, Tabular Deep Learning can match or surpass them when non‑linear interactions are prominent and imbalance handling is effective.
By Muntasir Tabasum, Tanpia Tasnim, Md. Ekramul Islam, Al Zadid Sultan Bin Habib
The paper revisits building damage assessment (BDA) from satellite imagery, emphasizing the need for a sensor‑agnostic, instance‑based task definition that can handle missing pre‑event data. It reviews existing datasets by modality, timing, and geography, critiques current single‑score evaluation practices, and proposes a more robust, ranking‑based multi‑score protocol. The authors also survey deep learning methods, highlight challenges in generalizing to new events and regions, and outline how these insights could shape future BDA challenges and data‑sharing practices.
By Anthony Cioppa, Virgile Blua, S\'ebastien Pi\'erard, Pietro Ceccato, Marc Van Droogenbroeck