One Shot vs. Iterative: Rethinking Pruning Strategies for Model Compression
arXiv:2508. 13836v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Pruning is a core technique for compressing neural networks to improve computational efficiency.
arXiv:2504. 05349v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Network pruning is used to reduce inference latency and power consumption in large neural networks.
arXiv:2508. 13836v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Pruning is a core technique for compressing neural networks to improve computational efficiency.
arXiv:2606. 12278v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural network pruning reduces model size by removing less important parameters while aiming to preserve predictive performance.
arXiv:2603. 12222v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision Transformers require significant computational resources and memory bandwidth, severely limiting their deployment on resource-constraint hardware.
arXiv:2606. 03428v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The large sizes of Spiking Vision Transformers (SViTs) still hinder their embedded implementation, highlighting the need for model compression.
Neural network pruning reduces model size by removing less important parameters while aiming to preserve predictive performance. Although the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) shows that sparse subnetworks can match dense networks when trained from suitable initializations, its iterative pruning procedure requires multiple complete training cycles.
arXiv:2509. 14230v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While structured pruning presents a highly effective pathway for accelerating Large Language Model (LLM) inference, existing methods frequently suffer from significant performance degradation and demand computationally retraining to recover capabilities.
arXiv:2607. 28418v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Pruning is a promising approach for improving the efficiency of LLMs.
arXiv:2608. 06901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable generalization across diverse multimodal tasks through large-scale pre-training, yet their rapidly increasing computational and memory requirements pose significant challenges for deployment in constrained environments.
arXiv:2608. 08624v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Domain generalization (DG) and neural network pruning are conventionally treated as distinct objectives, targeting out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness and model efficiency, respectively.
arXiv:2606. 14346v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Unstructured pruning produces sparse weight tensors, but the standard implementation keeps tensor shapes unchanged so the deployed model is no smaller than before pruning.
arXiv:2607. 15745v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Common practice when training Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) is to use randomly shuffled mini-batches.
arXiv:2605. 15435v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Standard deep-learning pipelines usually choose the network architecture before training and keep it fixed throughout optimization.