arXiv:2607. 25915v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Complex structured reasoning tasks often require additional computation, yet current language models obtain it mainly by increasing parameter scale or by serializing intermediate steps as chain-of-thought (CoT) tokens.
Latent reasoning models repeatedly update a latent state using the same recurrent block. As the recurrent depth increases, the sequence of latent states may converge to a compact subset of the state s...
Invariant-Measure Reasoners (ImR) introduce a stable representation for latent reasoning models by using an invariant measure that captures the long‑run distribution of latent states on a compact subset of the state space. Unlike traditional approaches that predict from a single latent state, ImR predicts from the expectation of the prediction head’s output under this invariant measure, thereby reducing prediction instability across recurrent depths. Experiments on maze and Sudoku tasks show that both fine‑tuning and training from scratch with ImR improve accuracy and allow models to exploit non‑fixed‑point dynamics that were previously destabilizing.
arXiv:2607. 18100v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Extended reasoning has become standard for frontier Large Language Models (LLMs), yet the trajectories these models produce remain largely uncontrollable.
Latent Recurrent Thoughts (LRT) proposes a method for reasoning with frozen large language models by operating in the model’s continuous representation space. A small auxiliary network generates initial latent vectors, which a tiny recurrent reasoner refines over multiple steps, decoupling computational depth from model size. Experiments on symbolic and natural‑language reasoning tasks show that LRT outperforms prior frozen‑decoder continuous‑space methods and chain‑of‑thought prompting while using far less inference compute.
LatentHarness unifies memory access and latent reasoning by treating them as sequential latent actions—THINK, RECALL, and EXIT—within a language model. It is trained via counterfactual policy distillation, which evaluates the impact of each action on the emitted token and learns when to recall evidence versus continue reasoning. On six long‑context reasoning benchmarks, a 1.4B‑parameter LatentHarness model outperforms the strongest baselines by 2.8% and 10.0% relative, while running 5.9× faster than the leading long‑context baseline.
arXiv:2606. 29164v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Latent reasoning models perform multi-step inference directly in hidden-state space, yet the structure of these latent reasoning trajectories remains poorly understood.
Generative Recursive Reasoning (GRAM) extends Recursive Reasoning Models by introducing probabilistic multi‑trajectory computation, allowing neural reasoning systems to explore multiple latent trajectories instead of a single deterministic path. GRAM treats reasoning as a stochastic latent trajectory, enabling multiple hypotheses, alternative solution strategies, and scalable inference through recursive depth and parallel sampling. Trained via amortized variational inference, GRAM outperforms deterministic recurrent and recursive baselines on structured reasoning and multi‑solution constraint satisfaction tasks, and also supports unconditional generation.
arXiv:2606. 03965v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models improve final-answer accuracy through extended chain-of-thought reasoning, but often spend tokens inefficiently and offer little inference-time control.
arXiv:2609.33149v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A common principle of effective learning is to practice material that is neither already mastered nor too difficult to permit progress. We ask how...
arXiv:2606. 01243v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Latent reasoning enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform multi-step inference within continuous hidden states, offering efficiency gains over explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT).
arXiv:2609.24066v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Best-of-$N$ is a widely used inference strategy for complex reasoning, whose effectiveness depends on whether sampled candidates can cover diverse and...