EDGE is a framework that attributes multiple related errors in multi-agent large language model systems by constructing an error dependency graph from observed error events. It validates a reliable causal subset through counterfactual rollout and uses this inference graph to guide a two-stage LLM-as-judge detector for error attribution. Experiments on TRAIL and MAST demonstrate that EDGE improves category-level multi-error attribution across most models and settings, and that the graph aids explanation and repair analysis.
By Jun Hou, Priya Pitre, Yi Fang, Xuan Wang
arXiv:2610.28811v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Agentic systems have demonstrated strong capabilities on complex tasks by enabling multiple interacting large language model (LLM)-based agents to coll...
By Wendy Zheng, Liang Wu, Yinhan He, Mayank Darbari, Jundong Li, Liangjie Hong
arXiv:2606. 00765v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based agents increasingly solve complex tasks through long trajectories involving reasoning steps, tool calls, and inter-agent communication.
By Md Nakhla Rafi, Md Ahasanuzzaman, Dong Jae Kim, Zhijie Wang, Tse-Hsun Chen
The paper introduces EMFA, a method for pinpointing the decisive error in large‑language‑model‑based multi‑agent systems. EMFA builds a structured representation of a failed execution, models how errors cascade and loop, and then screens candidates with propagation awareness before verifying them counterfactually. On the Who&When benchmark, EMFA outperforms prior methods, improving step‑level attribution accuracy by 3.45 and 4.40 percentage points on two subsets.
The paper introduces EMFA, a method for attributing failures in large language model-based multi-agent systems by identifying the decisive error—an agent–step pair whose correction would restore correct execution. EMFA builds a structured representation of the failed trajectory, models error propagation and persistent loops, and applies propagation-aware screening with counterfactual verification to pinpoint the decisive error. On the Who&When benchmark, EMFA outperforms prior methods, improving step-level attribution accuracy by 3.45 and 4.40 percentage points on two subsets.
By Jiaqi Liao, Yuanzhao Zhai, Huanxi Liu, Xu Zhang, Zheming Zhuang, Dawei Feng, Bo Ding, Huaimin Wang
The paper introduces SOAP, a method for attributing failures in large language model agents without requiring step-level labels or a separate set of successful trajectories. SOAP builds a spectral reference space from LLM representations to assign base error scores to each step, then uses attention-based soft dependencies to propagate downstream error signals back to their likely upstream causes. Experiments demonstrate that SOAP outperforms existing baselines in accurately identifying decisive steps responsible for task failures.
By Do Nguyen-Thanh, Junlin Fang, Bing Li, Zhen Fang, Sean Du
arXiv:2606. 03467v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based multi-agent systems exhibit remarkable collaborative capabilities in complex multi-step tasks.
By Taiyu Zhu, Yifan Wu, Weilin Jin, Ying Li, Gang Huang
arXiv:2607. 22610v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When a language model produces a response in a multi-turn conversation, which tokens from prior turns shaped that answer, and how did those dependencies propagate across prior turns?
By Jessica Tang, Shraddha Barke, Sharad Agarwal
arXiv:2610.18780v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Large language model multi-agent systems extend individual agents' capabilities through collaboration across specialized roles, tools, and workflows. Y...
By Xiaoguang Guo, Yaohao Long, Chuxu Zhang
arXiv:2607. 07989v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model (LLM) based multi-agent systems enable complex problem solving through coordinated reasoning and action, but their distributed structure also introduces new challenges in diagnosing system-level failures.
By Yufei Xia, Anjun Gao, Yueyang Quan, Zhuqing Liu, Minghong Fang
The paper introduces Adaptive Influence Graphs (AIGs), a two‑stage framework that first converts a failed trace into a structured graph and then navigates it to pinpoint the critical error in multi‑agent large language model systems. Experiments across multiple models demonstrate that richer trace representations and adaptive graph construction improve failure attribution, with AIGs achieving state‑of‑the‑art results on the Who&When benchmark. The study shows that both the diagnosing model and the way traces are represented and explored are crucial for accurate failure attribution.
By Yarden Bakish, Amir Dudai, Roy Ganz, Oren Nuriel, Elad Ben Avraham, Mor Shpigel Nacson, Ron Litman
arXiv:2606. 09071v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents now solve complex tasks through long plan-and-execution traces, yet the ability to locate errors in a completed traces still lags far behind, especially in the \emph{silent failure} regime.
By Xiaofeng Lin, Yingxu Wang, Tung Sum Thomas Kwok, Daniel Guo, Sahil Arun Nale, Charles Fleming, Guang Cheng