arXiv:2606. 12278v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural network pruning reduces model size by removing less important parameters while aiming to preserve predictive performance.
By Romana Qureshi, Hafida Benhidour, Said Kerrache, Nahlah Aljeraisy
Neural network pruning reduces model size by removing less important parameters while aiming to preserve predictive performance. Although the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (LTH) shows that sparse subnetworks can match dense networks when trained from suitable initializations, its iterative pruning procedure requires multiple complete training cycles.
arXiv:2608. 08624v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Domain generalization (DG) and neural network pruning are conventionally treated as distinct objectives, targeting out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness and model efficiency, respectively.
By Parham Sazdar, Mostafa Tavassolipour, Reshad Hosseini
arXiv:2607. 03860v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Strong Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (SLTH) asserts that sufficiently overparameterized, randomly initialized neural networks contain sparse subnetworks that, even without any training, can match the performance of a small trained network on a given dataset.
By Aakash Kumar, Emanuele Natale
arXiv:2510. 14812v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Structured weight sparsity accelerates training and inference on modern GPUs, but it trails unstructured dynamic sparse training (DST) in accuracy especially at extreme sparsity.
By Abhishek Tyagi, Arjun Iyer, Liam Young, William H Renninger, Christopher Kanan, Yuhao Zhu
arXiv:2608. 06630v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pruning reduces the inference cost of large language models, but existing criteria primarily preserve large activations or reconstruct layer outputs.
By Linghao Kong, Inimai Subramanian, Micah Adler, Dan Alistarh, Dan Gutfreund, Nir Shavit
arXiv:2603. 02234v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The Strong Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (SLTH) states that large, randomly initialized neural networks contain sparse subnetworks capable of approximating a target function at initialization without training, suggesting that pruning alone is sufficient.
By Davide Ferre' (CNRS, COATI, UniCA, I3S), Fr\'ed\'eric Giroire (I3S, COATI, UniCA), Frederik Mallmann-Trenn (CNRS, COATI, I3S, UniCA), Emanuele Natale (CNRS, COATI, I3S, UniCA)
arXiv:2603. 06952v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As graphs scale to billions of nodes and edges, graph Machine Learning workloads are constrained by the cost of multi-hop traversals over exponentially growing neighborhoods.
By Yuhang Song, Naima Abrar Shami, Romaric Duvignau, Vasiliki Kalavri
arXiv:2608. 10351v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this work we present a method to accelerate the optimization of learning high dimensional functions using deep neural network (DNN).
By Karl Pierce, Yuehaw Khoo, Haizhao Yang
arXiv:2607. 15745v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Common practice when training Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) is to use randomly shuffled mini-batches.
By Anxhelo Shehu, Enes Stastoli, Arben Cela
arXiv:2606. 07615v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep neural networks often contain redundant hidden units.
By Salem Ameen, Sunil Vadera
arXiv:2608. 02690v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-device training of deep neural networks is fundamentally constrained by the computational and memory costs of large-scale datasets.
By Hetian Liu, Jin Cui, Mengcheng Shi, Yanbin Hu, Xinyue Long, Boran Zhao, Pengju Pen