arXiv:2604. 24155v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The project of aligning machine behavior with human values raises a basic problem: whose moral expectations should guide AI decision-making?
By Benjamin Minhao Chen, Xinyu Xie
arXiv:2607. 28881v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As more responsibility is placed upon AI systems, it becomes increasingly important to guarantee that these systems are aligned with humanity.
By Winter Cross
arXiv:2608. 10327v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Can AI systems be aligned to human values?
By Andrew Smart, Shazeda Ahmed, Jackie Kay, Jimmy Tobin, Kris Shrishak, Abeba Birhane
arXiv:2610.07204v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Recent AI alignment work often frames alignment as a pre-deployment optimization problem: collect human feedback, learn preferences or principles, fi...
By Tao Long, Lydia B. Chilton
Large language models (LLMs) have become significant providers of mental health support, yet they remain products of an attention economy whose operational and commercial targets favour sustained engagement over the friction that effective psychological support often requires. Developers' safety responses have been largely reactive, addressing the most visible and acute harms while subtler, longer-term patterns of risk (e.
arXiv:2607. 01250v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sociotechnical alignment concerns the social desirability of AI behavior and is thus inherently normative, not merely technical.
By Esra D\"onmez, Agnieszka Falenska
The paper presents a multimodal framework that aligns open-ended learning autonomous robots with human purposes using large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs). It transforms human intentions expressed in natural language into robot missions and drives through a three-layer architecture—semantic alignment, mission generation, and drive modeling—allowing bidirectional interaction. Experiments in simulation and on a physical robot show that the system generates valid missions and behaviors, maintaining alignment with human intent.
By Diana Cerdas-Vargas, Alejandro Romero, Richard J. Duro
SIGMA is a self‑improving alignment framework that uses a model’s own reasoning to generate diverse alignment dilemma scenarios from a simple "Model Spec" and then fine‑tunes the model with self‑judged rewards. By performing spec‑guided task synthesis and rubric‑based reinforcement learning, SIGMA improves safety alignment in multi‑turn agentic settings, reducing harmfulness and misalignment scores while preserving general capability. The approach demonstrates that a model can autonomously strengthen its own safety reasoning without external supervision.
By Jingyu Zhang, Shruti Palaskar, Daniel Khashabi, Benjamin Van Durme, Leon A. Gatys, Joseph Yitan Cheng
arXiv:2607. 07766v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have become significant providers of mental health support, yet they remain products of an attention economy whose operational and commercial targets favour sustained engagement over the friction that effective psychological support often requires.
By Gwydion Williams, Sara Zannone, Bilal A Mateen
Warning: This paper studies stereotypes and biases, and contains potentially disturbing examples, used for illustration purposes only. Our findings should not be interpreted as an argument against alignment.
We are improving our AI systems’ ability to learn from human feedback and to assist humans at evaluating AI. Our goal is to build a sufficiently aligned AI system that can help us solve all other alignment problems.
The paper proposes a developmental framework for autonomous artificial agents that emphasizes learning social norms and alignment through direct interaction with dynamic environments. It argues that intrinsic motivations such as curiosity and competence can guide exploration, but also complicate alignment with human goals. By drawing parallels to child development, the authors suggest that regulatory sandboxes serve as pedagogical spaces where agents gradually acquire moral agency and adapt their behaviors through experience and cooperation.
By Marica Notte, Ludovica Marinucci, Vieri Giuliano Santucci