The paper presents a unified framework for regularization-based robust reinforcement learning by deriving upper bounds on the performance gap between nominal and worst-case policies. These bounds are expressed as a regularization objective plus a KL-divergence penalty, explaining why KL penalties enhance robustness. The authors reformulate robust training as a constrained optimization problem, updating the Lagrange multiplier jointly with the policy to automatically tune regularization, and validate the approach with extensive adversarial evaluations on continuous control tasks.
By Amine Andam, Jamal Bentahar, Mustapha Hedabou
arXiv:2404. 13879v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Uncertainties in transition dynamics pose a critical challenge in reinforcement learning (RL), often resulting in performance degradation of trained policies when deployed on hardware.
By Xulin Chen, Ruipeng Liu, Zhenyu Gan, Garrett E. Katz
arXiv:2510. 09041v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) has demonstrated remarkable success in developing autonomous driving policies.
By Junchao Fan, Qi Wei, Ruichen Zhang, Yang Lu, Jianhua Wang, Xiaolin Chang, Bo Ai
arXiv:2606. 03521v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: To improve the real-world applicability of reinforcement learning (RL), the field of adversarially robust RL studies how to train agents under adversarial environment perturbations.
By Siemen Herremans, Ali Anwar, Siegfried Mercelis
arXiv:2606. 29867v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has achieved significant success in robotics and autonomous systems, yet remains vulnerable to adversarial perturbations that can severely degrade performance.
By Adithya Mohan, Daniel Kriegl, Torsten Sch\"on
arXiv:2608.29247v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Deep neural networks remain highly vulnerable to adversarial perturbations, and adversarial training (AT) has become a widely used approach for improvi...
By Tejaswini Medi, Levan Mikeladze, Margret Keuper
To improve the real-world applicability of reinforcement learning (RL), the field of adversarially robust RL studies how to train agents under adversarial environment perturbations. In this setting, a protagonist agent optimizes a policy under environmental perturbations from an adversary, resulting in a zero-sum Markov game.
arXiv:2609.34426v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of safe offline reinforcement learning, which involves training a policy to satisfy safety constraints using an of...
By Shengchao Hu, Peng Wang, Jifeng Hu, Qiyang Zhou, Anning Hu, Li Shen, Ya Zhang, Dacheng Tao
arXiv:2606. 10228v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Safe exploration is a prerequisite for deploying reinforcement learning (RL) agents in safety-critical domains.
By Kaustubh Mani, Yann Pequignot, Vincent Mai, Liam Paull
The paper introduces CoDRA, a cost-to-disturbance ratio approach for adversarial reinforcement learning that balances controller performance and disturbance exposure without extra penalty terms. CoDRA uses a self‑normalized actor–critic update, scaling value terms by a stop‑gradient normalization constant derived from the current batch. Experiments on MuJoCo pendulum tasks show that CoDRA achieves the lowest cost across a range of forces and masses, outperforming other methods especially on the more challenging InvertedDoublePendulum environment.
By Taeho Lee, Donghwan Lee
The paper introduces Q-learning Penalized Transformer (QPT), a training–inference consistent framework for safe offline reinforcement learning. QPT trains a Transformer policy that generates actions conditioned on trajectory context and target return/cost while incorporating a Q-shaped penalty to balance safety, reward maximization, and behavior regularization. The method consistently outperforms strong baselines on 38 DSRL benchmark tasks and adapts robustly to varying constraint thresholds.
arXiv:2607. 26509v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep off-policy reinforcement learning algorithms for continuous control typically rely on neural value function approximation to guide policy improvement.
By Gong Gao, Xiao Lai, Ziqi Xie, Guojie Chen, Xianhui Liu, Weidong Zhao