MedVision: Benchmarking Quantitative Medical Image Analysis
arXiv:2511. 18676v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Current vision-language models (VLMs) in medicine are primarily designed for categorical question answering (e.
arXiv:2506. 17337v5 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision Language Models (VLMs) have shown promise in automating image diagnosis and interpretation in clinical settings.
arXiv:2511. 18676v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Current vision-language models (VLMs) in medicine are primarily designed for categorical question answering (e.
As vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly applied to medical AI, existing benchmarks mainly focus on evaluating their diagnosis ability over given medical images and texts, implicitly assuming that standardized medical images, texts or question-answer pairs are already prepared. However, this assumption does not hold when we apply VLMs in real clinical practice, where medical data is often raw, heterogeneous, and fragmented across different sources.
arXiv:2609.32352v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have shown increasing potential for medical image understanding, yet their capabilities in ophthalmic imaging r...
arXiv:2608. 15580v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliable endoscopic polyp reporting requires integrating quantitative lesion sizing, standardized Paris classification, and clinically meaningful morphological description within a single record.
arXiv:2609.38362v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generative vision-language models (VLMs) such as Qwen-VL and LLaVA achieve strong zero-shot performance on tasks overlapping with their pretraining dis...
The paper introduces the Medical Data Standardization Benchmark (MDS‑Bench), which evaluates vision‑language models (VLMs) on their ability to process raw, heterogeneous medical data. Models must identify source formats, convert raw images into VLM‑compatible inputs, extract relevant text, and organize the results into structured image‑text pairs. Experiments show that even the top VLM, Gemini 3 Flash, achieves only a 48.6% end‑to‑end success rate, underscoring the challenge of raw data standardization in clinical settings.
arXiv:2607. 04344v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) demonstrate remarkable generic capabilities, their clinical reasoning in specialized domains like ocular surface diseases (OSDs) is severely hindered by a paucity of high-fidelity, multimodal instruction-tuning data.
arXiv:2608.22363v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Medical visual question answering (VQA) is a crucial task in clinical AI, yet its evaluation has so far centered almost exclusively on English, limitin...
arXiv:2609.00866v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid advancement of vision-language models (VLMs) has accelerated progress in computational pathology; however, whole-slide image (WSI)-based pa...
The rapid advancement of vision-language models (VLMs) has accelerated progress in computational pathology; however, whole-slide image (WSI)-based pathology report generation remains limited by the sc...
The paper introduces an agentic AI Scientist workflow that automates the entire baseline development process for medical imaging by combining literature-guided reasoning, automated code generation, and hypothesis-driven experimentation. Evaluated on four public benchmarks covering segmentation, classification, and detection, the pipeline consistently improves validation performance, achieving competitive leaderboard results such as 6th place on both PUMA tracks and 31st on MILK10k. The approach also shows strong domain generalization on MIDOG25 across scanners, tumor types, and species, demonstrating that a skill-based, literature-guided agentic workflow can reduce engineering effort without task-specific redesign.
arXiv:2512. 21414v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent tool-use frameworks powered by vision-language models (VLMs) improve image understanding by grounding model predictions with specialized tools.