arXiv:2609.07983v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have recently emerged as a promising approach for solving Partial Differential Equations (PDEs), offering a me...
By Davide Staub, Ben Moseley
The paper presents Finite Basis Physics-Informed Neural Networks (FBPINNs) and their multilevel extensions as a new approach to solving the Helmholtz equation. By decomposing the computational domain into overlapping sub‑domains, each governed by a local neural network, the method aims to improve accuracy and computational efficiency for high‑frequency wave problems in complex two‑dimensional domains. The authors evaluate the technique on the homogeneous Helmholtz case, showing its potential to overcome limitations of traditional finite difference and finite element methods.
By Victorita Dolean, Daria Hrebenshchykova, St\'ephane Lanteri, Victor Michel-Dansac
arXiv:2607. 03682v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Convection-dominated convection-diffusion problems often develop thin layers, where the solution has sharp transition profiles and its derivatives are highly localized.
By Zihao Guo, Xin Li, Zhihong Xia
The paper evaluates the robustness of Physics‑Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) against noisy data in inverse problems, comparing them to a finite element method (FEM) plus optimizer baseline. Experiments on viscosity identification in 1D Burgers’ equation and 2D/3D Taylor‑Green Vortex with additive Gaussian noise show that PINNs, while requiring less human expertise, are outperformed by the traditional FEM approach in accuracy (e.g., RMSE 0.01 vs. 0.0013 for 2D Taylor‑Green with σ=1). PINNs do, however, exhibit better scaling with problem complexity, and the study highlights specific training failures that must be addressed for PINNs to become more competitive.
By Aleksandra Jekic, Afroditi Natsaridou, Signe Riemer-S{\o}rensen, Helge Langseth, Odd Erik Gundersen
arXiv:2608. 05892v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) often fail to accurately resolve partial differential equations (PDEs) with high-frequency or multi-scale solutions, as well as strongly nonlinear problems.
By Yulun Wu, Matthieu Barreau, Miguel Aguiar, Karl H. Johansson
arXiv:2602. 12706v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural operators have emerged as fast surrogate solvers for parametric partial differential equations (PDEs).
By Heechang Kim, Qianying Cao, Hyomin Shin, Seungchul Lee, George Em Karniadakis, Minseok Choi
arXiv:2609.33078v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Automatic differentiation (AD) lets neural networks compute derivatives of governing equations to machine precision, and this precision has made it...
By Ameya D. Jagtap
The paper presents a theoretical framework for certifying the accuracy of physics‑informed neural networks (PINNs) used to solve partial differential equations. It derives generalization bounds that link the residual loss minimized during training to the actual error in the solution space, showing that if the neural approximation stays within a compact subset, a vanishing residual guarantees convergence to the true solution. Deterministic and probabilistic convergence results are provided, offering explicit error guarantees based on residual, boundary, and initial condition errors.
By Amartya Mukherjee, Maxwell Fitzsimmons, David C. Del Rey Fern\'andez, Jun Liu
arXiv:2510. 10350v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Operator learning provides a data-driven approach to approximating solution operators of partial differential equations, but its effectiveness depends strongly on how input and output functions are represented.
By Chuqi Chen, Yang Xiang, Weihong Zhang
arXiv:2607. 25608v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a powerful paradigm for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) by embedding governing physical laws into deep neural networks.
By Pinki Khatun, M. Sajid, Abhinav Jha, M. Tanveer
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) often fail to accurately resolve partial differential equations (PDEs) with high-frequency or multi-scale solutions, as well as strongly nonlinear problems. Two factors underlie this difficulty: spectral bias, the tendency of neural networks to underfit high-frequency features; and representation-coefficient coupling, the entanglement of representation learning and coefficient fitting within a single nonconvex optimization objective.
arXiv:2606. 18032v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose a new weak-form Physics-Informed Neural Network approach (named INI-VPINN).
By Shayan Dodge (DESTeC, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy), Alessandro Formisano (Department of Engineering, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Aversa, Italy), Sami Barmada (DESTeC, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy)