The paper demonstrates that N‑gram based code watermarking schemes, widely used to identify machine‑generated code, are ineffective when faced with realistic code obfuscation. By modeling semantics‑preserving transformations as a Markov random walk and introducing the assumption of distribution consistency, the authors prove that obfuscation can drive the failure rate of any detector to nearly 1 minus its false‑positive rate. Extensive experiments across multiple watermarking methods, LLMs, languages, benchmarks, and obfuscators confirm that detectors collapse to near‑random performance (AUROC ≈ 0.5) after obfuscation.
arXiv:2607. 06009v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Attributing code to the large language model that produced it is essential for provenance, licensing, and misuse accountability, yet no deployed watermark meets this need.
arXiv:2502. 02068v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper introduces RoSeMary, the first-of-its-kind ML/Crypto codesign watermarking framework that regulates LLM-generated code to avoid intellectual property rights violations and inappropriate misuse in software development.
arXiv:2603. 23171v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Providers monitor deployed large language models (LLMs) to detect misuse that they cannot prevent.
arXiv:2608.27899v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: With the growing prevalence of large language model (LLM) generated content, watermarking is considered a promising approach for attributing text to...
arXiv:2606. 11817v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for code generation, raising concerns that they may be misused to produce malicious code.
arXiv:2606. 18430v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Statistical watermarks help organizations attribute large language model (LLM) outputs, yet existing detectors often struggle when watermark signals are weak, texts are repetitive, or watermarks are edited.
arXiv:2512. 13325v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Securing digital text is becoming increasingly relevant due to the widespread use of large language models.
arXiv:2606. 28962v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Model quantization is essential for the efficient deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs), but introduces a critical vulnerability: Quantization-Conditioned Backdoor (QCB) attacks.
arXiv:2607. 07881v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for code generation, but they struggle to generate functional code free of security vulnerabilities.
arXiv:2605. 28510v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) for code completion and generation are increasingly used in software development, yet they may reproduce training examples verbatim and without authorship attribution, raising legal and ethical concerns around plagiarism and license compliance.
arXiv:2606. 20436v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Malware analysts often inspect compiled binaries through decompiled pseudo-C, when source code is unavailable.
arXiv:2608. 03174v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI systems increasingly produce content whose provenance is difficult to verify, motivating watermarking techniques for identifying model-generated outputs.