The paper investigates whether code large language models (CodeLLMs) inadvertently reproduce proprietary or sensitive code by evaluating seven state‑of‑the‑art training data detection (TDD) methods on eight CodeLLMs. It introduces CodeSnitch, a benchmark of 9,000 function‑level code samples across three languages, each labeled as included or excluded from training data, and applies mutation strategies based on the Type‑1 to Type‑4 code clone taxonomy to test TDD robustness. The study offers a systematic assessment of current TDD techniques for code and suggests directions for developing more effective detection methods.
By Tianlin Li, Yunxiang Wei, Zhiming Li, Aishan Liu, Qing Guo, Xianglong Liu, Dongning Sun, Yang Liu
arXiv:2608. 03859v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) pose challenges to academic integrity and peer review.
By Peijia Guo, Wenxuan Xie, ZiGuang Li, Ming Li
arXiv:2606. 12620v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Thanks to the rapid adoption of AI code assistants powered by large language models (LLMs), industry codebases are, increasingly, a hybrid of AI- and human-authored code.
By Luke Patterson, Li Wang, Adam Faulkner
arXiv:2608. 05204v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-agent ecosystems are rapidly growing around reusable skills: mixed-modality packages of metadata, natural-language instructions, code, tools, references, and operational workflows.
By Jialuo Chen, Minghe Wang, Lingqi Jiang, Jianan Ma, Xinhao Deng, Xiaohu Du, Ruixiao Lin, Yunhao Feng, Linkang Du, Jingyi Wang
arXiv:2604. 01904v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Post-hoc unauthorized-training data detection for large language models (LLMs) typically assumes a query-with-originals regime: rights holders query a target LLM with raw proprietary data and assess whether the model assigns them stronger memorization-based detection signals, e.
By Muxing Li, Zesheng Ye, Sharon Li, Feng Liu
arXiv:2506. 11066v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Code retrieval is essential in modern software development, as it boosts code reuse and accelerates debugging.
By Jiahui Geng, Fengyu Cai, Shaobo Cui, Qing Li, Liangwei Chen, Chenyang Lyu, Haonan Li, Derui Zhu, Walter Pretschner, Heinz Koeppl, Fakhri Karray
arXiv:2607. 09452v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present a practical pipeline for recovering source code from stripped binary functions by combining reverse engineering, anchor-based source code retrieval, and large language model reasoning.
By Charles Edward Gagnon, Steven H. H. Ding, Philippe Charland, Benjamin C. M. Fung
arXiv:2606. 27401v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Semantic code search and clone detection are essential for software development, maintenance, and reuse.
By Leonardo Venuta, Francesco Tosoni, Paolo Ferragina
The paper demonstrates that N‑gram based code watermarking schemes, widely used to identify machine‑generated code, are ineffective when faced with realistic code obfuscation. By modeling semantics‑preserving transformations as a Markov random walk and introducing the assumption of distribution consistency, the authors prove that obfuscation can drive the failure rate of any detector to nearly 1 minus its false‑positive rate. Extensive experiments across multiple watermarking methods, LLMs, languages, benchmarks, and obfuscators confirm that detectors collapse to near‑random performance (AUROC ≈ 0.5) after obfuscation.
By Gehao Zhang, Mingzhe Li, Eugene Bagdasarian, Shiqing Ma, Juan Zhai
The paper introduces CAMS, a Claim‑Anchored Multi‑Document Summarization framework that decomposes source documents into atomic claims, resolves provenance deterministically from verbatim quotes to token spans, clusters equivalent claims across documents, and rewrites summaries so each sentence ends with claim identifiers linking back to source spans. CAMS separates provenance (an invariant for each emitted sentence) from faithfulness (an objective encouraged by selection, rewriting, and verification). Evaluations on MultiNews, DiverseSumm, and zero‑shot WCEP show that CAMS matches strong baselines in summary quality while improving faithfulness and citation precision, raising attribution accuracy from 38% to 64% and reducing human verification time per claim by 3.4×.
By Shuo Guan
arXiv:2606. 10087v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Pre-training on raw code teaches syntax but provides sparse signal for diverse real-world task formats.
By Ankit Gupta, Aditya Prasad, Rameswar Panda
arXiv:2607. 19104v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) excel at general-purpose code generation, yet how well they handle scientific code remains an open question.
By Weifeng Sun, Ye Fan, Yuchen Chen, Gou Tan, Jieke Shi, Yuan Yidi, Swee Liang Wong, Jonathan Pan, David Lo