arXiv:2606. 15001v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have enabled atomistic simulations across broad regions of chemical and materials space, but many remain computationally expensive and lack explicit electrostatics, limiting their use for systems governed by long-range interactions and electrical response.
By Xiaoyu Wang, Bingqing Cheng
arXiv:2603. 14700v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have become widely used tools in atomistic simulations.
By William J. Baldwin, Ilyes Batatia, Martin Vondr\'ak, Johannes T. Margraf, G\'abor Cs\'anyi
arXiv:2607. 14486v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine-learning force fields (MLFFs) are reliable only near their training distribution, making efficient construction of diverse training sets a major bottleneck for both train-from-scratch and foundation fine-tuning workflows.
By Sheng Bi, Yi-Ze Wang, Jun Cheng
arXiv:2606. 15892v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Accurate interatomic potentials enable molecular dynamics of materials, molecules, and interfaces beyond density-functional-theory length and time scales.
By Jia Bi, Alin Marin Elena, Samuel Pinilla
The paper presents a semi‑local framework that learns long‑range electrostatics and polarization for machine‑learning interatomic potentials using polarizable atomic multipoles. Local equivariant descriptors predict environment‑dependent monopoles, dipoles, and quadrupoles, while a non‑self‑consistent linear response captures residual charge transfer and polarization. Across multiple benchmarks and MLIP architectures, this multipole hierarchy systematically improves potential energy surface accuracy and yields physically meaningful electrical responses, including accurate Born effective charges, infrared and Raman spectra, and surface‑specific vibrational signatures.
By Yoonjae Park, Dongjin Kim, Daniel S. King, Nam H. {\DJ}\`ao, Roya Savoj, Sebastien Hamel, Xiaoyu Wang, Bingqing Cheng
BranchIP introduces a single-model framework that learns adaptive tensor product computation for equivariant machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs). Using a novel distillation loss, it achieves up to 2.4× speed‑up and 2.6× memory reduction across model sizes while preserving physical fidelity. The adaptive computation also offers interpretability by indicating which interactions require deeper processing and how depth correlates with chemical complexity and dynamics.
By Laura Zichi, Gil Harari, Chuin Wei Tan, Marc L. Descoteaux, Albert Zhu, Menghang Wang, Yoel Zimmermann, H. T. Kung, Boris Kozinsky
arXiv:2602. 04861v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials (MLIPs) sometimes fail to reproduce the physical smoothness of the quantum potential energy surface (PES), leading to erroneous behavior in downstream simulations that standard energy and force regression evaluations can miss.
By Ryan Liu, Eric Qu, Tobias Kreiman, Samuel M. Blau, Aditi S. Krishnapriyan
arXiv:2606. 30961v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Advances in deep learning architectures and representations have enabled ML-driven chemical property prediction, but state-of-the-art (SOTA) models have remained largely confined to independent codebases and lack support for diverse chemical species.
By Jacob W. Toney, Samir Darouich, Yiran Wang, Aaron G. Garrison, Johannes K\"astner, Heather J. Kulik
arXiv:2606. 04279v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine-learned (ML) exchange-correlation (XC) functionals aim to replace human-designed density functional approximations by learning directly from reference data, but they still do not consistently outperform traditional $\mathcal{O}(N^4)$-scaling hybrid functionals.
By Eike S. Eberhard, Luca A. Thiede, Abdul Aldossary, Andreas Burger, Nicholas Gao, Vignesh Bhethanabotla, Al\'an Aspuru-Guzik, Stephan G\"unnemann
arXiv:2609.00488v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Machine learning interatomic potentials bridge the gap between quantum chemical precision and classical computational speed, enabling molecular dynamic...
By Prajwal Ananth, Shuwen Yue
BOOM is a new benchmark for evaluating out‑of‑distribution (OOD) molecular property predictions in machine learning. It provides chemically‑informed tests across common property prediction tasks and assesses over 150 model‑task combinations. The study shows that current models, including chemical foundation models, struggle to generalize OOD, with the best model still exhibiting three times higher error than in‑distribution predictions.
By Evan R. Antoniuk, Shehtab Zaman, Tal Ben-Nun, Peggy Li, James Diffenderfer, Busra Sahin, Obadiah Smolenski, Everett Grethel, Tim Hsu, Anna M. Hiszpanski, Kenneth Chiu, Bhavya Kailkhura, Brian Van Essen
arXiv:2606. 18691v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pre-trained materials foundation models, or machine learning interatomic potentials, leverage general physicochemical knowledge to effectively approximate potential energy surfaces.
By Youngwoo Cho, Seunghoon Yi, Wooil Yang, Sungmo Kang, Young-woo Son, Jaegul Choo, Joonseok Lee, Soo Kyung Kim, Hongkee Yoon