The paper introduces two Hessian-based data augmentation techniques—UniAug and ModeAug—to improve machine‑learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs). These methods use simple Taylor expansions to generate augmented configurations without modifying training objectives or increasing computational overhead. Experiments on both non‑equilibrium and equilibrium datasets show that the augmentations enhance model accuracy and provide practical guidelines for specific tasks.
By Bumju Kwak, Jeonghee Jo
arXiv:2602. 16908v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Allegro is a machine learning interatomic potential model designed to predict atomic properties in molecules using E(3) equivariant neural networks.
By G. Laskaris, D. Morozov, D. Tarpanov, A. Seth, J. Procelewska, G. Sai Gautam, A. Sagingalieva, R. Brasher, A. Melnikov
arXiv:2606. 17077v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Proton dissociation constants (pKa) are critical for functional molecule discovery and molecular modeling.
By Wang Rui, Liu Dinghao
arXiv:2607. 03513v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present AquaGen, the first all-atom, explicit solvent, periodic-boundary-condition-aware generative model that produces molecular configurations from the Boltzmann distribution at a fraction of the cost of molecular dynamics (MD).
By Emmanuel Bengio, Sanjeev Raja, Yui Tik Pang, Kerstin Klaeser, Cristian Gabellini, Nikhil Shenoy, Francesco Di Giovanni, Prudencio Tossou
arXiv:2607. 09456v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Universal machine learning interatomic potentials (uMLIPs) bridge quantum-mechanical accuracy and large-scale molecular dynamics, but the cost of high-accuracy calculations such as r$^2$SCAN limits training to datasets that remain small relative to the open materials space.
By Mingxiang Luo, Xinnan Mao, Lu Wang, Lei Bai, Feng Ding, Yuqiang Li
arXiv:2607. 13737v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: For low-data and resource-constrained regimes typical of quantum chemistry, parameter-efficient learning is a key objective.
By James T. Pegg, Hubert Okadome Valencia, Ronin Wu
arXiv:2606. 00794v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Merging first-principles calculations with machine learning (ML), we aim to accelerate the exploration of catalytic behaviour in novel materials.
By Pavlo Melnyk, Anmar Karmush, M{\aa}rten Wadenb\"ack, Ania Beatriz Rodr\'iguez-Barrera, Johanna Rosen, Michael Felsberg, Jonas Bj\"ork
arXiv:2604. 09320v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Mechanistic understanding and rational design of complex chemical systems depend on fast and accurate predictions of electronic structures beyond individual building blocks.
By Siqi Chen, Zhiqiang Wang, Yili Shen, Xianqi Deng, Xi Cheng, Cheng-Wei Ju, Jun Yi, Guo Ling, Dieaa Alhmoud, Hui Guan, Zhou Lin
arXiv:2606. 30170v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative molecular design is shaped by simple proxy benchmarks for drug-like properties and models pretrained on large pharmaceutical datasets.
By Matthias Blaschke, Daniel Kienzle, Zsuzsanna Koczor-Benda, Julian Lorenz, Rainer Lienhart, Fabian Pauly
arXiv:2509. 21624v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Fundamental tasks in computational chemistry, from transition state search to vibrational analysis, rely on molecular Hessians, which are the second derivatives of the potential energy.
By Andreas Burger, Luca Thiede, Nikolaj R{\o}nne, Varinia Bernales, Nandita Vijaykumar, Tejs Vegge, Arghya Bhowmik, Alan Aspuru-Guzik
arXiv:2606. 30961v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Advances in deep learning architectures and representations have enabled ML-driven chemical property prediction, but state-of-the-art (SOTA) models have remained largely confined to independent codebases and lack support for diverse chemical species.
By Jacob W. Toney, Samir Darouich, Yiran Wang, Aaron G. Garrison, Johannes K\"astner, Heather J. Kulik
BOOM is a new benchmark for evaluating out‑of‑distribution (OOD) molecular property predictions in machine learning. It provides chemically‑informed tests across common property prediction tasks and assesses over 150 model‑task combinations. The study shows that current models, including chemical foundation models, struggle to generalize OOD, with the best model still exhibiting three times higher error than in‑distribution predictions.
By Evan R. Antoniuk, Shehtab Zaman, Tal Ben-Nun, Peggy Li, James Diffenderfer, Busra Sahin, Obadiah Smolenski, Everett Grethel, Tim Hsu, Anna M. Hiszpanski, Kenneth Chiu, Bhavya Kailkhura, Brian Van Essen