Adversarial Review (AR) is a minimal cooperative code‑review protocol that employs a main coding agent, a reviewer, and a critic. The reviewer evaluates code while the critic audits the review through structured disagreement before the main agent edits. On multiple benchmarks (LiveCodeBench, SWE‑PRBench, SWE‑bench Verified), AR achieves higher pass rates or F1 scores than larger multi‑agent baselines, demonstrating that effective code review can be achieved with only three agents and minimal, evidence‑grounded disagreement.
arXiv:2605. 17548v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Code review has evolved for decades, from informal peer checking to today's pull request (PR) workflows, yet it remains a largely manual and cognitively demanding process.
arXiv:2607. 13091v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: LLM-based coding agents repeat the same classes of mistakes across sessions because they lack a mechanism to retain corrections from human review feedback.
arXiv:2606. 13608v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent systems are advancing quickly across domains, but their evaluation remains fragmented.
arXiv:2606. 29957v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Most coding-agent benchmarks are static: an agent receives a complete task description up front and is judged only by its final code.
arXiv:2609.37216v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models can generate plausible code-review comments, but such comments may contain technically incorrect claims that mislead developers...
arXiv:2609.16096v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language model coding agents have recently become useful for software tasks, but weaker or open-weight agents still struggle to reliably interp...
OpenCollab is a multi‑agent coding framework that unifies organization design, enforces experimental control on a shared runtime, and tracks execution via fine‑grained event streams. It introduces the metric Adherence to measure whether the declared organization is actually realized, showing that small configuration changes can shift adherence from 47.2% to 97.2%. Experiments demonstrate that a two‑coder workflow built on OpenCollab achieves new state‑of‑the‑art performance against mainstream harnesses while using the fewest tokens, and that a well‑designed organization can outperform strong existing harnesses.
arXiv:2607. 03316v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic code review, where autonomous agents provide code review comments on pull requests, is increasingly integrated into development workflows, yet there is limited empirical evidence on how developers respond to such comments in practice.
arXiv:2606.21804v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Maintainability is a core dimension of software engineering, shaping how code is written, reviewed, and developed over time. While coding age...
Large language model coding agents have recently become useful for software tasks, but weaker or open-weight agents still struggle to reliably interpret user intent and execute complex multi-step work...
arXiv:2603. 21489v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: AI agents have become increasingly capable at isolated software engineering (SWE) tasks such as resolving issues on Github.
arXiv:2607. 06624v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present AgentLens, a production-assessed benchmark for interactive code agents.