arXiv Machine Learning

Beyond Activation Alignment:The Alignment-Diversity Tradeoff in Task-Aware LLM Quantization

arXiv:2607. 00908v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mixed-precision quantization (MPQ) has become a key technique for deploying large language models under stringent memory and compute constraints.

arXiv AI
Sep 10

Accuracy is Not Enough: A Divergence-Based Approach to Evaluate Fidelity Loss in Quantized LLMs

The paper argues that relying solely on zero‑shot task accuracy is insufficient for evaluating quantized large language models (LLMs) because accuracy ignores changes in the full predictive distribution. It proposes a distribution‑sensitive framework that measures fidelity loss by computing statistical distances—such as Jensen‑Shannon Divergence and Total Variation Distance—between the full‑vocabulary output distributions of a full‑precision BF16 reference and its quantized counterparts. Experiments across five foundation architectures and four reasoning benchmarks show that these divergence metrics increase with stronger quantization, revealing distributional drift that top‑1 accuracy fails to capture, and suggest that mixed‑precision Q4_K schemes can offer lower divergence than uniform Q4_0 at comparable memory usage.

By Shahzeb Qamar, Lorenz Sparrenberg, Christian Bauckhage, Baha Rababah, Carson Leung, Murat Kantarcioglu, Cuneyt Gurcan Akcora, Rafet Sifa
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 21

SpecQuant: Speculative Decoding with Multi-Parent Quantization for Adaptive LLM Inference

SpecQuant is a training‑free framework that merges speculative decoding with multi‑parent quantization to enable adaptive, efficient inference of large language models. It generates several quantized variants (INT4, FP8, FP16) from a single base model and routes queries to the appropriate variant based on predicted complexity, using lightweight models for simple tasks and full‑precision models for complex reasoning. Evaluations on Qwen2.5 models across MMLU, AlpacaEval, and GSM8K show 35‑43% speedups with less than 2% accuracy loss, facilitating practical on‑device LLM deployment without specialized infrastructure.

By Harish KB, Jagadeeswaran M, Pradheep P, Yuvanesh S, Sivakumar T
arXiv Machine Learning
1d ago

ConQuR: Corner Aligned Activation Quantization via Optimized Rotations for LLMs

ConQuR introduces a lightweight post‑training rotation calibration for large language model activation quantization. By learning orthogonal rotations that align normalized activations with the corners of an inscribed hypercube, the method distributes activation energy evenly and can be updated online without storing activations. Experiments on Llama‑2 and Llama‑3 models (3B–70B) show competitive or improved perplexity and reasoning performance while avoiding costly training or large offline storage.

By Chayne Thrash, Ali Abbasi, Soheil Kolouri
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

WINDQuant: Weight-Informed Neural Decision-Making for Global Mixed-Precision LLM Quantization

arXiv:2605. 26660v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Quantization is an effective approach to reduce the memory footprint and inference cost of large language models (LLMs), yet maintaining performance in the ultra-low-bit regime remains challenging.

By Phong Nam Huu Nguyen, Khoi M. Le, Cong-Duy T Nguyen, Anh Tuan Luu, Thong Thanh Nguyen, Tho Quan
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

Squeeze10-LLM: Squeezing LLMs' Weights by 10 Times via a Staged Mixed-Precision Quantization Method

Squeeze10-LLM is a staged mixed‑precision post‑training quantization framework that reduces 16‑bit LLM weights to an average of 1.6 bits per weight by assigning 80% of weights to 1 bit and 20% to 4 bits. It introduces Post‑Binarization Activation Robustness (PBAR), a weight significance metric that considers activation impact, and Full Information Activation Supervision (FIAS), a strategy that preserves activation information to limit error propagation. Experiments on LLaMA and LLaMA2 demonstrate that Squeeze10‑LLM achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance for sub‑2‑bit weight‑only quantization, raising average accuracy from 43% to 56% on six zero‑shot classification tasks.

By Qingcheng Zhu, Yangyang Ren, Linlin Yang, Yanjing Li, Sheng Xu, Haodong Zhu, Juan Zhang, Runqi Wang, Baochang Zhang