arXiv Machine Learning

A Comprehensive Evaluation on Quantization Techniques for Large Language Models

arXiv Machine Learning
12h ago

InfoQuant: Shaping Activation Distributions for Low-Bit LLM Quantization

InfoQuant is a train‑free method that reshapes activation distributions to be more compatible with low‑bit quantizers. It uses Peak Suppression Orthogonal Transformation (PSOT) and adaptive outlier‑token selection to reduce numerical range while maintaining dispersion, thereby lowering quantization error. Across several large language model families, InfoQuant outperforms existing post‑training quantization and end‑to‑end training baselines, preserving 97% of floating‑point accuracy on average and narrowing the LLaMA‑2 13B performance gap by 42%.

By Ke Li, Dong An, Xiaoling Zang, Can Ye, Liang Xie, Qibo Qiu, Chen Shen, Xiaofei He, Wenxiao Wang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 10

Squeeze10-LLM: Squeezing LLMs' Weights by 10 Times via a Staged Mixed-Precision Quantization Method

Squeeze10-LLM is a staged mixed‑precision post‑training quantization framework that reduces 16‑bit LLM weights to an average of 1.6 bits per weight by assigning 80% of weights to 1 bit and 20% to 4 bits. It introduces Post‑Binarization Activation Robustness (PBAR), a weight significance metric that considers activation impact, and Full Information Activation Supervision (FIAS), a strategy that preserves activation information to limit error propagation. Experiments on LLaMA and LLaMA2 demonstrate that Squeeze10‑LLM achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance for sub‑2‑bit weight‑only quantization, raising average accuracy from 43% to 56% on six zero‑shot classification tasks.

By Qingcheng Zhu, Yangyang Ren, Linlin Yang, Yanjing Li, Sheng Xu, Haodong Zhu, Juan Zhang, Runqi Wang, Baochang Zhang
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 11

Statistically-Lossless Quantization of Large Language Models

arXiv:2605. 02404v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Model quantization has become essential for efficient large language model deployment, yet existing approaches present clear trade-offs: methods such as GPTQ and AWQ achieve practical compression but are lossy, while lossless techniques preserve fidelity but lack inference acceleration.

By Michael Helcig, Eldar Kurtic, Dan Alistarh