arXiv AI

Mechanistic Personality Analysis of LLMs Steering Personality via Latent Feature Interventions

arXiv:2606. 28770v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to simulate human-like OCEAN personality traits in generated text.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 21

Traits Run Deeper: Trait-Specific Asymmetric Fusion for Multimodal Personality Assessment

Traits Run Deeper introduces a personality assessment framework that tailors multimodal fusion to each trait dimension. It comprises a Multimodal Foundation Representation module that uses psychology-informed semantic templates, a Trait-Specific Modality Fusion module that asymmetrically fuses modalities to reduce cross‑modal interference, and a Distribution‑Calibrated Personality Regression module that corrects label imbalance. The approach achieves a ~25% reduction in mean squared error on the AVI Challenge 2026 validation set and wins the Personality Assessment Track.

By Jia Li, Qian Chen, Wei Wang, Xinyu Li, Zhenzhen Hu, Dongsheng Shao, Richang Hong, Meng Wang
arXiv AI
Aug 19

Beyond BFI: The CSI for Enhanced Reliability and Validity in Evaluating LLM Personality Traits

The paper introduces the Core Sentiment Inventory (CSI), a new personality trait evaluation tool for large language models (LLMs) that addresses reliability and validity issues found in existing methods like the Big Five Inventory (BFI). CSI is designed specifically for LLMs, supports both English and Chinese, and provides detailed psychological portraits of model behavior. Experiments show that CSI captures nuanced behavioral patterns, improves reliability, and correlates strongly (above 0.85) with real-world LLM outputs.

By Huanhuan Ma, Haisong Gong, Xiaoyuan Yi, Xing Xie, Philip S. Yu, Dongkuan Xu
arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 11

When is Your LLM Steerable?

arXiv:2606. 11599v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Activation steering offers a lightweight approach to control language models' behavior at inference time, but whether it succeeds or fails heavily depends on the prompt, concept, model, and steering configuration.

By Chenrui Fan, Yize Cheng, Ming Li, Soheil Feizi, Tianyi Zhou
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 9

Large-Language-Models-as-a-Judge in Theory-Agnostic Adaptive Metric-Alignment for Prototypical Networks in Personality Recognition

Personality recognition has traditionally been constrained by theory-dependent formulations, where models are trained to fit predefined psychological taxonomies rather than uncovering shared underlying behavioral structure. This limits generalization, as personality itself is better understood as theory-invariant, while existing annotations reflect only partial and sometimes inconsistent views of the same latent traits.

arXiv AI
Jul 10

Large-Language-Models-as-a-Judge in Theory-Agnostic Adaptive Metric-Alignment for Prototypical Networks in Personality Recognition

arXiv:2607. 08374v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Personality recognition has traditionally been constrained by theory-dependent formulations, where models are trained to fit predefined psychological taxonomies rather than uncovering shared underlying behavioral structure.

By Jing Jie Tan, Ban-Hoe Kwan, Danny Wee-Kiat Ng, Yan-Chai Hum, Shih-Yu Lo, Po-An Chen, Noriyuki Kawarazaki, Kosuke Takano, Anissa Mokraoui
arXiv AI
Jun 10

Modeling Complex Behaviors: Multi-Personality Composition and Dynamic Switching in Vision-Language Models

arXiv:2606. 11074v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: With the widespread deployment of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in social interaction, understanding and controlling their behavior under complex personality conditions is essential.

By Peiqi Jia (Xi'an Jiaotong University), Haonan Jia (Beihang University), Ziqi Miao (Beihang University), Linkang Du (Xi'an Jiaotong University), Yuntao Wang (Xi'an Jiaotong University), Zhou Su (Xi'an Jiaotong University)
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 10

When is Your LLM Steerable?

Activation steering offers a lightweight approach to control language models' behavior at inference time, but whether it succeeds or fails heavily depends on the prompt, concept, model, and steering configuration. Finding the regime and boundaries of successful steering typically requires expensive grid searches and post-hoc evaluation of full autoregressive rollouts.