The Shape of Wisdom: Decision Trajectories in Language Models
arXiv:2606. 01202v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models do not simply choose an answer at the output layer.
arXiv:2606. 01202v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models do not simply choose an answer at the output layer.
arXiv:2601. 04098v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Transformer language models systematically prefer tokens at specific input positions regardless of semantic relevance---a phenomenon known as positional bias.
arXiv:2607. 05316v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models generate one token at a time, yet their responses show remarkably consistent length structure: step-by-step solutions converge in predictable token counts, retrievals stop after a few sentences, retractions extend responses by measurable amounts.
The paper proposes the interlingua hypothesis, suggesting that large language models translate by encoding a source sentence into a latent, task‑agnostic feature space and then decoding a target sentence from that space. Three lines of evidence support this: (1) BLEU variance across language pairs is largely explained by language‑specific competences without pair‑specific interactions; (2) many model components influence both monolingual and translation tasks; and (3) fine‑tuning on monolingual data recovers most translation gains seen with aligned documents. These findings converge to support the hypothesis and point toward new ways to understand and improve LLM translation.
arXiv:2603.18908v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Independently trained language models often learn compatible late-stage representations, despite differences in training objectives, architectures,...
arXiv:2607. 23067v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Contrastive decoding methods such as DoLa improve the factuality of Large Language Models (LLMs) by contrasting the output distributions of mature and premature layers.
arXiv:2605. 26795v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting enhances large language model performance, yet what drives these gains remains unclear.
arXiv:2512. 06343v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reward models are central to Large Language Model (LLM) alignment within the framework of RLHF.
Large language models generate one token at a time, yet their responses show remarkably consistent length structure: step-by-step solutions converge in predictable token counts, retrievals stop after a few sentences, retractions extend responses by measurable amounts. We ask whether the model carries an internal estimate of how much response remains.
ChronoSteer is a decoupled agentic framework that bridges large language models and time series foundation models by learning cross‑modal alignment from synthetic paired supervision. It converts textual events into revision instructions that steer a frozen time‑series model, discretizes these instructions into a compact codebook to reduce semantic divergence, and then refines the predictions with a two‑stage training strategy. The authors also release a leakage‑controlled multimodal benchmark and report a 25.8% improvement in zero‑shot prediction accuracy over the unimodal backbone.
The study investigates how layer‑wise intervention responses in language models change over the course of pretraining, using single‑block identity bypass across multiple checkpoints and model‑domain combinations. It finds that while depth ordering of responses persists, their magnitudes shift, with nearby checkpoints showing stronger rank correspondence than distant ones and large changes occurring at positions that recur across samples and transfer across evaluation domains. Controlled experiments reveal that these longitudinal changes cannot be explained by a single downstream sensitivity and depend on perturbation strength and direction, indicating that layer sensitivity is structured but dynamic.
arXiv:2606. 01060v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Preference alignment has substantially improved the observable behavior of large language models, yet it remains unclear what alignment changes internally.