arXiv:2608. 16347v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Direct communication between AI systems relies on natural language as an intermediate layer, incurring encoding/decoding overhead, token cost, and latency.
By Fernando Cardenas Piepereit
arXiv:2601. 22947v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Masked diffusion language models (MDLMs) generate text by unmasking tokens in parallel and have recently emerged as alternatives to autoregressive language models.
By Mengyu Ye, Keito Kudo, Ryosuke Takahashi, Jun Suzuki
The paper introduces Perturbation, a method that treats representations in language models as learning conduits rather than activation patterns. By fine‑tuning a model on a single adversarial example and observing how this perturbation spreads to other inputs, the approach avoids geometric assumptions and does not identify representations in untrained models. In trained models, Perturbation uncovers structured transfer across multiple linguistic scales, indicating that language models generalize along representational lines and acquire linguistic abstractions through experience.
By Joshua Rozner, Cory Shain
arXiv:2606. 27242v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training-free source selection for LLM families with shared vocabularies arises in scientific string domains such as SMILES, protein, and genomic sequences, where candidate corpora share a tokenizer but differ in prediction targets.
By John Sweeney
The paper introduces MATCHA, a method that learns explicit many-to-many layer maps between independently trained language models. MATCHA decomposes the alignment into a layer map—an explicit target‑by‑source matrix—and a shared feature map, allowing joint learning of layer correspondence and feature transformation from prompts. Experiments on 42 model pairs across three families show that MATCHA reconstructs target activations more faithfully and improves retrieval metrics, while enabling transfer of activation‑space interventions between models.
By Alina Sudakov, Guy Bar-Shalom, Fabrizio Frasca, Haggai Maron
arXiv:2610.33495v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Combining language models is usually done by averaging weights, which works only when the models share a common starting point. We ask whether five fro...
By Oladimeji Anthonio, Dimeji Olawuyi, Oloruntoba Ajayi, Temilola Aderemi
arXiv:2609.32717v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) alignment is intended to ensure that models remain helpful and safe, but its stability under input distributional...
By Mohan Li, Chengyu Yu, Francesco Sovrano, Marc Langheinrich, Martin Gjoreski
arXiv:2608. 05164v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Independently trained large language models may develop shared internal representations of semantic concepts despite architectural differences -- but whether this geometric similarity has functional consequences for cross-model behavioural control remains untested.
By Ayushi Agarwal
arXiv:2506.17871v4 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Despite their impressive capabilities, aligned large language models (LLMs) often generate outputs that lack diversity. What drives this cons...
By Chenghao Yang, Sida Li, Ari Holtzman
arXiv:2503. 06211v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Text-pretrained language models (LMs) encode rich world knowledge, but adapting them to process and generate perceptual modalities such as audio and images while effectively leveraging that knowledge remains challenging.
By Santiago Cuervo, Adel Moumen, Yanis Labrak, Sameer Khurana, Antoine Laurent, Mickael Rouvier, Phil Woodland, Ricard Marxer
arXiv:2607. 05316v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models generate one token at a time, yet their responses show remarkably consistent length structure: step-by-step solutions converge in predictable token counts, retrievals stop after a few sentences, retractions extend responses by measurable amounts.
By Mohamed Amine Merzouk, Dmitri Carpov, Mirko Bronzi, Damiano Fornasiere, Adam Oberman
arXiv:2507. 18043v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Inference-time steering methods offer a lightweight alternative to fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) by modifying internal activations at test time without updating model weights.
By Duy Nguyen, Archiki Prasad, Elias Stengel-Eskin, Mohit Bansal