arXiv:2509.19276v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Solving ill-posed inverse problems requires powerful and flexible priors. We propose leveraging pretrained latent diffusion models for this t...
By Tim Y. J. Wang, O. Deniz Akyildiz
arXiv:2602. 11711v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This article addresses the issue of estimating observation parameters (response and error parameters) in inverse problems.
By Jean-Fran\c{c}ois Giovannelli
arXiv:2602. 11059v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper addresses the issue of inversion in cases where (1) the observation system is modeled by a linear transformation and additive error, (2) the problem is ill-posed and regularization relies on a Bayesian strategy, (3)~the prior is modeled by a diffusion process adjusted on an available large set of examples.
By Jean-Fran\c{c}ois Giovannelli
arXiv:2606. 17048v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diffusion and flow-based models learn powerful data priors by training a denoiser to reverse Gaussian corruption.
By Abbas Mammadov, Ozgur Kara, Kaan Oktay, Iskander Azangulov, Adil Kaan Akan, Hyungjin Chung, James Matthew Rehg, Yee Whye Teh
arXiv:2512. 08022v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We propose a novel diffusion-based posterior sampling method within a plug-and-play framework.
By Jinyuan Chang, Chenguang Duan, Yuling Jiao, Ruoxuan Li, Jerry Zhijian Yang, Cheng Yuan
arXiv:2606. 26592v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose latent-space diffusion posterior sampling (L-DPS), an approximate Bayesian framework for high-dimensional inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs).
By Yuanzhe Wang, Alexandre M. Tartakovsky
arXiv:2603. 14798v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We propose a machine-learning algorithm for Bayesian inverse problems in the function-space regime.
By Zilan Cheng, Li-Lian Wang, Zhongjian Wang
FlowSGS introduces a flow-based posterior sampling method that combines Split Gibbs Sampling (SGS) with Langevin dynamics for the likelihood step and Stochastic Interpolants (SI) for the prior step. By integrating a pretrained flow model into the prior step via SI's reverse-time SDE and a novel timestep correction, FlowSGS reduces the number of network evaluations compared to plug‑and‑play diffusion samplers. Experiments demonstrate state‑of‑the‑art performance on various inverse problems, including the first flow‑based solution to a nonlinear inverse problem (Fourier phase retrieval).
By Tianao Li, Xinhui Qian, Emma Alexander
arXiv:2607. 19333v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Diffusion-based methods have achieved remarkable empirical success in solving inverse problems.
By Yuchen Jiao, Na Li, Changxiao Cai, Yuxin Chen, Gen Li
FB‑GDM is a fully‑Bayesian guided diffusion method that eliminates the need for task‑specific hyperparameter tuning in linear inverse problems. It derives a closed‑form conditional score from a Gaussian approximation of ΦGDM, treating two precision parameters as latent variables inferred via variational inference at each reverse step. Experiments on CelebA‑HQ show that FB‑GDM outperforms ΦGDM at its nominal setting, matches a ground‑truth‑calibrated oracle within 0.1 dB, and remains robust to changes in the forward operator, noise level, or image distribution without hallucinations.
By Gatien S\'eguy (SATIE), Thomas Rodet (SATIE)
PosteriorBench is a new benchmark that evaluates how well generative inverse solvers recover full posterior distributions rather than just a single reconstruction. It tests four physics-based inverse problems—Darcy flow inversion, Poisson source recovery, carbon capture and storage, and light transport material inference—using high-fidelity reference posteriors generated by rejection sampling and MCMC. The benchmark employs five metrics (posterior-mean error, posterior-standard-deviation error, maximum mean discrepancy, sliced Wasserstein distance, and radially averaged power-spectrum error) to assess pointwise accuracy, uncertainty, distributional alignment, and global frequency fidelity, revealing significant distribution-matching gaps in current solvers and highlighting the importance of neural operators, guidance weights, and generation noise for posterior-variance calibration.
By Jiachen Yao, Zi-Siang Hsu, Xi Deng, Aditi Gupta, Xin Ju, Sally M Benson, Gege Wen, Anima Anandkumar
arXiv:2609.14596v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Training-free diffusion inverse solvers typically choose between local measurement guidance and costly clean-space posterior updates. Independent poste...
By Qi Yu, Hanlin Wu, Xiaohui Sun