How can we personalize a shared expert library from a user's pairwise choices? Prior work can realize different reward trade-offs by merging reward-specialized experts, given a vector of trade-off wei...
arXiv:2604. 07343v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Pluralistic alignment has emerged as a critical frontier in the development of Large Language Models (LLMs), with reward models (RMs) serving as a central mechanism for capturing diverse human values.
The paper introduces PLUS, a framework that uses reinforcement learning to generate text-based summaries of individual users’ preferences, characteristics, and past conversations. These summaries condition a reward model, allowing it to predict personalized response preferences and improving reward accuracy by 11–77 % over the standard Bradley‑Terry model. PLUS demonstrates robust performance with new users and topics, achieves a 25 % improvement over existing personalized RLHF techniques, and enables zero‑shot personalization for state‑of‑the‑art models like GPT‑4.
arXiv:2607. 20471v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Personalization, the act of varying a message to induce action from a specific receiver while keeping sender, channel, and time fixed, has a long tradition in psychology and marketing as a two-party problem in which sender and receiver have independent objectives.
arXiv:2606. 06614v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite growing interest, most evaluations of large language models' (LLMs') personalization abilities have relied on synthetic data.
arXiv:2607. 04590v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Pairwise human comparisons are a primary interface through which modern AI systems learn human preferences.
arXiv:2601. 22276v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As Text-to-Image (T2I) diffusion models are increasingly used in real-world creative workflows, a principled framework for valuing contributors who provide a collection of data is essential for fair compensation and sustainable data marketplaces.
arXiv:2604. 18239v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Preference optimization is widely used to align large language models (LLMs) with human preferences.
The paper introduces TEAM-Design, a rule that assigns two replay probabilities to each task—one for a human-only replay and one for an agent-only replay—based on how difficult it is to predict the missing baseline outcome and the cost of replay. It addresses the challenge of deciding whether to keep a human-AI workflow or replace it with a single actor when only one outcome can be observed after deployment. The authors prove that TEAM-Design solves the budgeted design problem and controls error rates, and demonstrate its effectiveness on clinical and coding benchmarks, noting it excels when one comparison is clearly harder than the other.
The paper presents a method for fine‑tuning a large language model (LLM) recommender to generate personalized, non‑harmful explanations for its recommendations. By training two LLM‑judge reward models and using constrained GRPO, the authors achieve a significant increase in the PASS rate for all three criteria, from 0.649 to 0.956 on their own judges and from 0.677 to 0.931 on an independent judge. The fine‑tuned model maintains its original recommendation performance, demonstrating that LLM‑based recommenders can be adapted to complex tasks without loss of effectiveness.
arXiv:2608. 06400v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reward models are central to learning from human preferences, yet identifying what drives their predictions remains challenging.
arXiv:2510. 05342v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a simple and effective method for aligning large language models.