arXiv:2608. 07894v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances have highlighted the potential of machine learning, particularly Large Language Models (LLMs), for analyzing and optimizing programs.
By Calvin Higgins, Marco Alvarez
arXiv:2508. 21290v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: jina-code-embeddings is a novel code embedding model suite designed to retrieve code from natural language queries, perform technical question-answering, and identify semantically similar code snippets across programming languages.
By Daria Kryvosheieva, Saba Sturua, Michael G\"unther, Han Xiao
The paper introduces LWVIC4Code, a non‑contrastive, layer‑wise representation learning method for detecting Type‑IV code clones—semantically equivalent fragments that differ syntactically. It builds on the VICReg framework, adding cross‑layer consistency regularization and depth‑dependent weighting to refine semantic information across transformer layers. Experiments on Python and multi‑language datasets show that LWVIC4Code matches or outperforms contrastive baselines and zero‑shot large language models, generalizing well to Java and C# without requiring negative samples.
By Luciano Marchezan, Kevin Delcourt, Eugene Syriani, Houari Sahraoui
arXiv:2509. 23449v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Binary code similarity detection is a core task in reverse engineering.
By Charles E. Gagnon, Steven H. H. Ding, Philippe Charland, Benjamin C. M. Fung
The paper investigates whether code large language models (CodeLLMs) inadvertently reproduce proprietary or sensitive code by evaluating seven state‑of‑the‑art training data detection (TDD) methods on eight CodeLLMs. It introduces CodeSnitch, a benchmark of 9,000 function‑level code samples across three languages, each labeled as included or excluded from training data, and applies mutation strategies based on the Type‑1 to Type‑4 code clone taxonomy to test TDD robustness. The study offers a systematic assessment of current TDD techniques for code and suggests directions for developing more effective detection methods.
By Tianlin Li, Yunxiang Wei, Zhiming Li, Aishan Liu, Qing Guo, Xianglong Liu, Dongning Sun, Yang Liu
The paper investigates using synthetic natural-language descriptions to contrastively pretrain small transformer encoders for code representation. By pairing generated descriptions with code in a dual-encoder setup during training and discarding them at inference, the authors achieve significant improvements over traditional pretraining baselines on most evaluated tasks. When fine‑tuned, these models match or surpass much larger zero‑shot models and remain competitive with execution‑aware supervision, indicating a scalable alternative for code embeddings.
By Kenneth Paulsen, Florian Tambon, Mike Papadakis, Shin Yoo
arXiv:2605. 16046v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Semantic code search has been widely adopted in both academia and industry.
By Yiming Liu, Ruofan Liu, Yun Lin, Zicong Zhang, Weiyu Kong, Pengnian Qi, Xiao Cheng, Weinan Zhang, Qianxiang Wang, Linpeng Huang
arXiv:2608. 02084v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Binary function embedding models are trained to encode the semantics of binary code in such a way that they can be generalized to a variety of reverse engineering tasks, such as binary code search, vulnerability detection, or malware classification.
By Samuel Valenzuela, Johannes Kinder
arXiv:2512. 10092v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Analyzing large-scale text corpora is a core challenge in machine learning, crucial for tasks like identifying undesirable model behaviors or biases in training data.
By Nick Jiang, Xiaoqing Sun, Lisa Dunlap, Lewis Smith, Neel Nanda
arXiv:2607.00171v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Text embeddings are standard for semantic similarity tasks, yet their evaluation remains an open challenge. Current benchmarks are static, cover on...
By Andrianos Michail, Stylianos Psychias, Michelle Wastl, Simon Clematide, Rico Sennrich, Juri Opitz
arXiv:2601. 03808v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved notable performance in code synthesis; however, data-aware augmentation remains a limiting factor, handled via heuristic design or brute-force approaches.
By Usha Shrestha, Dmitry Ignatov, Radu Timofte
arXiv:2608. 15412v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Encoder-based code representation models remain widely deployed for discriminative tasks such as clone detection and code classification, where their small size and low inference cost are decisive.
By Yifeng He, Yundi Xu, Christopher Castro Gaw Gonzalo, Zili Wang, Hao Chen