arXiv:2608. 15373v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Inverse physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) can reconstruct a field accurately while returning an incorrect physical parameter.
By Yifan Zhang, Qian Tao
arXiv:2606. 05199v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The identification of constitutive neural network models from heterogeneous full-field deformation data provides a robust alternative to traditional calibration methods based on homogeneous stress-strain experiments, particularly given the high dimensionality of trainable parameters.
By Matthias Knipper, Chenyi Ji, Malte Brand, Kevin Linka
arXiv:2606. 16575v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved remarkable success in scientific computing, yet they often suffer from spectral bias in capturing oscillatory and multiscale behaviors.
By Yong Wang, Tao Zhou, Xuhui Meng
arXiv:2607. 20339v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Constitutive modeling under uncertainty remains a central challenge for reliable mechanics simulations, particularly when the available stress-deformation data are sparse, noisy, or heterogeneous.
By Somesh Pratap Singh, Govinda Anantha Padmanabha, Jingye Tan, Steven Yang, Reese E. Jones, D. Thomas Seidl, Nikolaos Bouklas
arXiv:2602. 02547v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are effective methods for solving inverse problems and discovering governing equations from observational data.
By Hankyeol Kim, Pilsung Kang
Constitutive modeling under uncertainty remains a central challenge for reliable mechanics simulations, particularly when the available stress-deformation data are sparse, noisy, or heterogeneous. We propose interval and fuzzy physics-augmented neural networks (iPANNs and fPANNs) for uncertainty-aware hyperelastic constitutive modeling.
arXiv:2607. 06479v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a promising framework for solving partial differential equations while embedding the underlying physical laws directly into the learning process.
By Sonal Ankush Chibire, Jenn-Terng Gau, Bo Zhang
arXiv:2606. 06313v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Wall shear stress (WSS) governs near-wall transport dynamics and is a key hemodynamic indicator in cardiovascular flows, yet remains difficult to infer accurately due to the need for precise computation of near-wall velocity gradients.
By Mahmoud Elhadidy, Siva Viknesh, Roshan M. D'Souza, Amirhossein Arzani
arXiv:2605. 07060v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a mesh-free framework for solving PDE-constrained inverse problems, but their extension to Bayesian inversion still faces a fundamental difficulty: prior distributions are typically defined in the weight space of neural networks, whereas physically meaningful prior assumptions are more naturally expressed in function space.
By Ryoichiro Agata, Tomohisa Okazaki
arXiv:2606. 14565v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Constitutive artificial neural networks (CANNs) provide interpretable material model discovery, but have so far been used in stress-supervised settings based on apparent stress-strain data from homogeneous tests.
By Benjamin Alheit, Siddhant Kumar, Mathias Peirlinck
arXiv:2606. 19375v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Identifying anisotropic yield functions remains challenging since yielding is not directly observed in full-field mechanical measurements, directional calibration can require many loading directions, and selecting an appropriate analytical form is nontrivial.
By Hyeonbin Moon, Donghyuk Cho, Jecheon Yu, Jeong Whan Yoon, Seunghwa Ryu
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a promising framework for solving partial differential equations while embedding the underlying physical laws directly into the learning process. This study presents a PINN-based framework for modeling transient elastodynamic wave propagation in bimaterial systems governed by the axisymmetric equations of linear elasticity.