Hugging Face Trending Papers

How Hackable Is Your Speech Quality Metric? A Corrected Protocol, a Benchmark, and What Patching Buys

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 9

How Hackable Is Your Speech Quality Metric? A Corrected Protocol, a Benchmark, and What Patching Buys

The paper introduces a corrected protocol for measuring the hackability of speech quality predictors, addressing two key flaws in previous methods. Using this protocol, it finds that four published predictors vary widely in vulnerability, with NISQA being the most hackable. The study also audits an attack‑detect‑patch loop, showing it only hardens predictors within its own attack space and can even reduce performance.

By Ali Alavi, Donald S. Williamson
arXiv AI
Sep 12

Spectral Masking and Interpolation Attack (SMIA): A Black-box Adversarial Attack against Voice Authentication and Anti-Spoofing Systems

The paper introduces the Spectral Masking and Interpolation Attack (SMIA), a black‑box adversarial technique that subtly alters inaudible frequency regions of AI‑generated audio to fool voice authentication systems and their countermeasures. Experiments show SMIA achieves at least 82% success against combined verification and countermeasure systems, 97.5% against standalone speaker verification, and 100% against countermeasures, revealing a critical security gap. The authors argue that current static defenses are inadequate and call for dynamic, context‑aware defenses that can adapt to evolving threats.

By Kamel Kamel, Hridoy Sankar Dutta, Keshav Sood, Sunil Aryal
arXiv AI
Oct 7

Exploiting Acoustic and Content-Oriented Speaker Verification Attacks Against Multilingual Voice Anonymization

The paper investigates how acoustic and content-oriented speaker verification attacks perform against multilingual voice anonymization. It evaluates both attacker types on anonymized speech, builds a multilingual voice-converted dataset to enhance cross‑lingual generalization, and finds that attack success depends on how much linguistic utility is preserved. Acoustic‑oriented attacks generally outperform content‑oriented ones, but the performance gap narrows when linguistic information is well maintained, and the new dataset improves results while reducing cross‑lingual disparities.

By Ridwan Arefeen, Ze Li, Rong Tong, Ming Li, Xiaoxiao Miao
arXiv AI
Aug 20

`From Prompt to Perturbation': An Adaptive Framework for Voice-Based Jailbreaks on Audio LLMs

The paper introduces an adaptive jailbreak attack framework that evaluates both cascaded pipelines and end‑to‑end large audio‑language models (LALMs) under a unified setting. It employs a feedback‑guided mutation engine to automatically generate and refine jailbreak candidates across textual prompts and audio perturbations, thereby broadening attack diversity. Experiments on six audio‑based systems show that both paradigms remain highly vulnerable, with the framework achieving higher attack success rates than existing methods.

By Linghan Huang, Bo Li, Huaming Chen, Kim-Kwang Raymond Choo
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 15

The Limits of Reference-Free Speech Quality Metrics as Evaluators and Rewards on Modern Text-to-Speech

arXiv:2609.13150v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reference-free quality predictors such as UTMOS, DNSMOS and SCOREQ are the de facto automatic evaluators for text-to-speech (TTS) and are increasingl...

By Antonis Asonitis, Juan Pablo Zuluaga Gomez, Francesco Verdini, Aref Farhadipour, Marzieh Razavi, Pierre-Edouard Honnet, Vijeta Avijeet