arXiv AI

Which Metadata Matters for LLM Tool Selection in MCP? Evidence from Controlled Factor-Level Interventions

arXiv AI
Aug 26

Hybrid Semantic Tool Discovery for Enterprise MCP Gateway: Architecture and Implementation

Hybrid Semantic Tool Discovery for Enterprise MCP Gateway presents SCOUT, a system that addresses two major challenges in large language model (LLM) agent tool usage: a context‑engineering bottleneck and a tool discoverability barrier. SCOUT reframes tool exposure as a context‑selection problem, injecting only relevant tools into the model’s context window and providing two MCP meta‑tools—tool_search and execute_tool—to perform hybrid retrieval via BM25 and dense vector search. In production at PayPal, SCOUT cuts MCP tool‑token consumption by 99%, dramatically reducing per‑query inference cost while remaining model‑agnostic and requiring no client‑side changes.

By Olympia Saha, Amy Wang, Srinivasan Manoharan
arXiv AI
Jun 16

ToolMenuBench: Benchmarking Tool-Menu Filtering Strategies for Reliable and Efficient LLM Agents

arXiv:2606. 15508v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tool-augmented large language model agents increasingly operate over large tool libraries, but existing evaluations often focus on whether a model can call a tool correctly rather than how the visible tool menu shapes reliability, efficiency, and safety-relevant risk exposure.

By Rahul Suresh Babu, Laxmipriya Ganesh Iyer
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 24

Constraint Tax in Open-Weight LLMs: An Empirical Study of Tool Calling Suppression Under Structured Output Constraints

Tool Calling and Structured Output are two core capabilities of modern Agent systems, yet their interaction under joint deployment conditions remains insufficiently understood. This paper reports a reproducible phenomenon observed in a production Agent system: when Tool Calling and JSON Schema constraints are simultaneously enabled, multiple open-weight models cease invoking tools despite maintaining high schema compliance.

arXiv AI
1d ago

Action-Space Shaping for LLM Agents: Measuring and Mitigating Tool-Schema Bias

The paper investigates how the representation of tool interfaces—referred to as a tool schema—affects the performance of large language model agents. By systematically transforming a native tool schema with nine operators, the authors demonstrate that agents exhibit significant variability in success rates across different but functionally equivalent schema variants, a phenomenon they call schema bias. Experiments on eleven LLMs, including closed models, reveal that success can range from complete failure to 97% solely due to schema differences, and that training only mitigates bias when the specific variant is included in the training data.

By Yinhong Liu, Zhili Tan, Zilin Wang, Zhijiang Guo