arXiv Computation and Language

Better Answers, Weaker Evidence Control: Evidence Bypass in On-Policy Distillation

The paper studies how on‑policy distillation (OPD) can improve answer accuracy while reducing a model’s reliance on supporting evidence. Through matched document interventions, the authors identify an "evidence bypass" phenomenon where a student model keeps an originally correct answer even after the supporting document is changed. They propose Evidence‑Paired OPD (EP‑OPD), which uses matched documents and an answer‑level margin to recover most of the counterfactual accuracy lost by standard OPD while preserving much of its original‑document accuracy gains.

arXiv AI
Oct 12

COFFEQA: Counterfactual-Guided Few-Shot Distillation for LLM Question Answering

COFFEQA introduces a counterfactual-guided few‑shot distillation method for open‑book question answering, leveraging minimally modified contexts that prompt the teacher model to produce alternative answers. By pairing factual samples with validated counterfactuals—filtered using a new Context Following Difficulty metric—COFFEQA constrains the student’s decision boundary to better match the teacher’s. Experiments on multiple QA benchmarks show that COFFEQA consistently outperforms factual‑only distillation, achieving significant gains in EM and F1 scores with a limited few‑shot budget.

By Kavinda Kehelella, Sanghamitra Dutta
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 24

What Changes When Fact-Verification Scores Improve? Evidence and Answer Accounting Across Trained Verifiers and LLMs

The paper introduces a joint fact‑verification score that evaluates both answers and the evidence submitted with them. On the FEVEROUS dataset, replacing the DCUF evidence with UnifEE evidence improves the strict score by about 9.6 percentage points, while answer accuracy rises only 1.96 points. The study also shows that increasing context length for large language models yields modest evidence‑gain improvements, and that detailed answer‑evidence analyses uncover patterns missed by aggregate metrics.

By Han Chen, Yingrui Li
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 19

Beyond the Answer: Student-Conditioned Trace Construction for Reasoning Distillation

The paper introduces ReDiST, a framework that constructs student‑conditioned reasoning traces to enhance learning beyond answer‑only supervision. ReDiST revises student attempts using evidence and a verified answer, then selects the best traces with a frozen reader that evaluates answer recovery and probability. The distilled student is trained offline, and experiments on QA benchmarks show improved performance over baseline trace methods and highlight varying effectiveness across source and transfer settings.

By Shaoang Li, Yanhang Shi, Yufei Li, Mingfu Liang, Frank Shyu, Sandeep Pandey, Luke Simon, Xi Liu, Jian Li
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 3

Learning Evidence Sufficiency Boundaries for Selective Answering in Grounded Multi-Hop QA

The paper introduces Evidence Sufficiency Boundary Training, a framework that teaches models to abstain from answering until the supplied evidence is fully sufficient, and to remain stable when additional redundant evidence is added. By constructing ordered evidence chains from datasets such as HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, and MuSiQue, the method applies level supervision, a boundary flip margin, post‑boundary stability, and answer recall protection. Experiments with Qwen2.5‑3B‑Instruct and LoRA adaptation show improved boundary localization (flip accuracy 0.807 vs 0.781) and a lower unsupported‑answer rate (0.095 vs 0.101) while maintaining competitive raw QA F1.

By Haruto Sato, Yuki Tanaka, Ren Nakamura, Aoi Kobayashi, Mei Ito
arXiv AI
Oct 9

RAG-Stress: Probing the Limits of Evidence Reliance in Retrieval-Augmented Generation

The paper introduces RAG‑Stress, a diagnostic protocol that tests how retrieval‑augmented generation models handle misleading evidence. By fixing the question and reference answer, editing a single assertion to support an incorrect answer, and varying source‑priority policies and evidence positions, the study measures misleading rate (MR) and clean accuracy across fifteen systems on multiple QA datasets. Results show that prioritizing documents increases MR by 10.9–13.5 percentage points, with the highest MR when the misleading span appears at the end of the evidence.

By Shunyuan Zhou, Hao Chen, Tianyu Wang, Goose Lin, Zaiyuan Wang, Haiying Zhao
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 25

DynaKRAG: A Unified Framework for Learnable Evidence Control in Multi-Hop Retrieval-Augmented Generation

DynaKRAG is a unified framework that learns a state‑conditioned policy to control evidence acquisition in multi‑hop retrieval‑augmented generation. It uses a deterministic validity layer to build an action set, a learned continuation gate to decide between generating an answer or gathering more evidence, and an advantage scorer to rank evidence operations by predicted gain. Across HotpotQA, 2Wiki, and MuSiQue with various backbone models, DynaKRAG achieves top EM and F1 scores, improves token and retrieval efficiency, and enables terminal evidence compression that reduces context size while boosting answer quality.

By Chenyu Zhou, Yaqi Wu, Xiaolei Guo, Jiaqi Huang, Xianfa Zhang, Junxu Zhang, Zhuo Yu, Zhubo Shi, Jianghao Lin, Dongdong Ge