arXiv Machine Learning

Do Language Models Consistently Encode the Current Year?

arXiv:2608. 15507v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A consistent concept of the current time is important for temporal reasoning, yet how language models represent the current time is not well understood.

arXiv AI
Jul 14

PRISM Edit: One Vector for All Temporal Answers

arXiv:2607. 11327v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Model editing keeps large language models (LLMs) up to date without retraining, but temporal facts expose a limitation of the prevailing locate-and-edit paradigm: an update is not always a replacement.

By Chen Huang (Tsinghua University), Qi Zheng (Tsinghua University), Ruiqin Zheng (ByteDance), Long Zeng (Tsinghua University), Yuantong Xu (ByteDance)
arXiv AI
Jul 15

Scaling Point-in-Time Language Models

arXiv:2607. 11889v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models trained on unrestricted internet corpora inevitably embed information from the future, introducing lookahead bias that compromises the validity of backtests and causal inference in finance and the social sciences.

By Bryan Kelly, Semyon Malamud, Johannes Schwab, Teng Andrea Xu
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 14

The Illusion of Robustness: Aggregate Accuracy Hides Prediction Flips under Task-Irrelevant Context

As large language models (LLMs) grow more capable, they are increasingly deployed in context-rich settings where task inputs are often accompanied by long, partially irrelevant context. In a controlled setting, we find that state-of-the-art models often appear robust to task-irrelevant context at the aggregate level: prepending it to benchmark questions causes little change in overall accuracy.