The vocal music of each language carries a distinctive sonic identity, even without instrumental accompaniment. We ask whether these differences are measurable and traceable to specific phonemes. To t...
arXiv:2607. 26698v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cover song generation (CSG) should preserve the melodic and linguistic content of a reference song while recreating the remaining musical components.
arXiv:2606. 05852v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Text-to-speech (TTS) and singing voice synthesis (SVS) both aim to generate human vocal audio from symbolic inputs, but they impose different requirements on the generation process.
Neural TTS systems can sound natural across languages, but naturalness does not guarantee the preservation of sound contrasts that distinguish words from their grammatical forms. Standard metrics like MOS do not test for this.
arXiv:2607. 01965v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural TTS systems can sound natural across languages, but naturalness does not guarantee the preservation of sound contrasts that distinguish words from their grammatical forms.
arXiv:2607. 05902v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Chamber music, as a highly precise multi-part interactive system, contains a logic of "role assignment and dynamic interaction" that provides an extremely valuable blueprint for exploring human-computer collaborative composition paradigms.
arXiv:2606. 26451v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatic singing quality assessment (SQA) requires evaluating lyrical correctness and musical fidelity while handling expressive variations.
The paper evaluates whether music‑text models truly capture fine‑grained musical meaning by introducing attribute‑swap perturbations that exchange properties such as timbre or order between instruments in a caption. Four contrastive models and one large audio‑language model were tested to see if they would score higher on the original caption than on the perturbed one. The results show that none of the contrastive models reliably distinguish the captions, and the audio‑language model’s advantage stems mainly from language priors, indicating that CLAP scores behave like a bag‑of‑words and fail to reflect attribute bindings.
arXiv:2603. 28378v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present the first systematic Membership Inference Attack (MIA) evaluation of LALMs.
The paper presents the first music‑specific, layer‑wise empirical study of hallucination in audio‑language models, framing it as a hierarchical perceptual grounding failure across five layers: sound events, temporal properties, tonal attributes, style, and emotion. It introduces MuseDiag, a diagnostic framework that evaluates nine models and finds universal vocal misperception, significant tonal perception differences, and identifies Audio‑Flamingo‑3 as the most stable model. The study also proposes two training‑free mitigation methods, ADD‑M and TPA, which reduce hallucination in probing but show variable effectiveness in free‑form generation, highlighting the need for multi‑paradigm evaluation.
arXiv:2606. 17835v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This study examines the extent to which the wav2vec2.
The paper investigates whether audio language models encode phonetic features similarly when processing spoken versus written input. By comparing mean representations of minimal phoneme pairs across six models, seven features, and 15 languages, the study finds that only voicing in two Qwen2.5-Omni models shows a significant shared direction, and that the model family—not size—determines feature representation. The analysis uses cosine similarity against a random-pair reference to assess alignment across modalities.