InfiFPO is a new preference optimization technique for implicit model fusion that replaces the reference model in Direct Preference Optimization with a fused source model, preserving probability information and avoiding complex vocabulary alignment. By incorporating probability clipping and max‑margin fusion, it aligns a pivot model with human preferences while distilling knowledge from multiple source models. Experiments on 11 benchmarks show that InfiFPO consistently outperforms existing fusion and preference optimization methods, raising Phi‑4’s average score from 79.95 to 83.33 and improving performance in mathematics, coding, and reasoning tasks.
arXiv:2509. 23982v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Preference alignment is a critical step in making Large Language Models (LLMs) useful and aligned with (human) preferences.
arXiv:2609.06893v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Direct preference optimization DPO is a promising offline approach for aligning large language models (LLMs) due to its simplicity, computational eff...
The paper introduces BALIGN, a balanced data selection strategy designed to reduce catastrophic forgetting—referred to as the alignment tax—in large language models during preference-based alignment. By analyzing preference optimization gradients, the authors identify three data-centric features that influence parameter drift: the reference model's log-probability margin, token length differences between chosen and rejected responses, and TF‑IDF similarity to general capability corpora. BALIGN aggregates these features into a composite risk score to filter out high-risk preference samples, thereby preserving foundational capabilities while maintaining alignment gains with minimal computational overhead.
Aligning large language models to human preferences is crucial for real-world deployment but frequently incurs an alignment tax, leading to the catastrophic forgetting of pre-trained general capabilit...
arXiv:2510. 05342v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a simple and effective method for aligning large language models.
arXiv:2609.05899v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Aligning large language models with human preferences remains a challenge, primarily due to the critical role of preference data quality in effective...
arXiv:2608.23149v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The alignment of Large Language Models heavily relies on English-centric high-quality preference data, which often leads to suboptimal performance in...
arXiv:2505. 11166v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite advances in pretraining with extended context sizes, large language models (LLMs) still face challenges in effectively utilizing real-world long-context information, primarily due to insufficient long-context alignment caused by data quality issues, training inefficiencies, and the lack of well-designed optimization objectives.
arXiv:2504. 06659v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite advances in Preference Alignment (PA) for Large Language Models (LLMs), mainstream methods like reinforcement learning with human feedback face notable challenges.
arXiv:2608. 11947v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multiple-choice benchmarks are widely used to evaluate large language models, but MCQ scores conflate knowledge with sensitivity to option order, which makes them unreliable measures of model knowledge.
arXiv:2602. 02898v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Language model benchmarks are pervasive and computationally-efficient proxies for real-world performance.
arXiv:2605.24981v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Choosing a Large Language Model (LLM) for a given task requires comparing many strong candidates, yet standard evaluation relies on costly annotati...