Hugging Face Trending Papers

DINO-VPT: Hierarchical Visual Prompt Tuning for Joint Physical-Digital Face Anti-Spoofing

With the increasing diversity of spoofing attacks, there is a growing demand for unified Face Anti-Spoofing (FAS) models capable of detecting both physical and digital threats. While existing Vision-Language Models (VLMs) demonstrate high generalization in this context, they heavily rely on complex multimodal fusion and external text encoders.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 24

VPA-Guard: Defending and Benchmarking Image-to-Video Generation Against Visual Prompt Attacks

Recent advancements in Image-to-Video (I2V) generation have transformed input images from simple appearance references into interactive control interfaces where visual cues such as arrows, sketches, and emojis orchestrate complex video dynamics with unprecedented controllability. However, these seemingly innocuous static cues can be interpreted by models as executable temporal instructions, unfolding into harmful actions in the generated videos.

arXiv AI
Jun 29

When the Prompt Becomes Visual: Vision-Centric Jailbreak Attacks for Large Image Editing Models

arXiv:2602. 10179v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent advances in large image editing models have shifted the paradigm from text-driven instructions to vision-prompt editing, where user intent is inferred directly from visual inputs such as marks, arrows, and visual-text prompts.

By Jiacheng Hou, Yining Sun, Ruochong Jin, Haochen Han, Fangming Liu, Wai Kin Victor Chan, Alex Jinpeng Wang
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 18

IMFD: End-to-end Multi-Face Forgery Detection through Instruction-based Large Vision-Language Models

The paper introduces IMFD, an end‑to‑end multi‑face forgery detector that uses instruction‑based Large Vision‑Language Models (LVLMs). IMFD jointly localizes faces and predicts forgery labels in a single stage, explicitly incorporating predicted face bounding boxes into the textual instruction to improve grounding and detection. Experiments on converted multi‑face forgery datasets show that IMFD outperforms several state‑of‑the‑art methods.

By Dasom Choi, Sangjun Moon, Hyeongchan Im, Jaeeon Park, Jingun Kwon, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Taro Watanabe, Manabu Okumura