arXiv Machine Learning

Resample the Answer: Where to Spend Test-Time Compute in Recursive Reasoning

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 4

RecurTrace: Adaptive Latent Reasoning with Loop-Time Memory

RecurTrace introduces adaptive latent reasoning for language models by allowing each looped layer to attend to its own past states and by using a halting head to decide when to stop iterating. This approach overcomes two limitations of prior latent recurrence methods: limited access to earlier computations and a fixed loop count that mismatches input difficulty. In experiments on MathQA, RecurTrace achieves 56.9% accuracy with an average of 2.0 loops, outperforming fixed‑depth baselines and other adaptive methods, and it also improves generation accuracy across a range of model sizes.

By Yuxiang Wang, Kunyu Feng, Yingda Shen, Haoning Xu, Junyu Wang, Zhizheng Wu
arXiv AI
Oct 9

Scaling to Tens of Thousands of Test-Time Iterations with Loop-Native Attention Residuals

The paper introduces InfiLoop, a loop-native residual connection designed for looped Transformers to prevent performance degradation as iterations increase. InfiLoop learns which past computations to retain and how much to accept from each new update, combining content-based weighting with learned temporal decay to maintain a running summary of recurrent states. Across extensive reasoning tasks, a 7M-parameter InfiLoop model outperforms existing recursive architectures, achieving 97.9% exact accuracy on Sudoku-Extreme and 13.6% pass@2 on ARC-AGI-2, and continues to improve with test-time looping beyond 20,000 effective steps.

By Pengxiang Li, Dilxat Muhtar, Di He, Guinan Su, Lu Yin, Shiwei Liu
arXiv AI
Jun 30

Flow Reasoning Models: Scaling Reasoning Through Iterative Self-Refinement

arXiv:2606. 29150v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Discrete flow models have recently shown promising performance on few-step text generation; however, when naively applied to structured reasoning tasks such as Sudoku and Zebra puzzles, they converge confidently to incorrect answers (solving only $\sim$36% of Sudoku puzzles).

By Alec Helbling, Andrey Bryutkin, Mauro Martino, Nima Dehmamy, Hendrik Strobelt
arXiv AI
Aug 7

Refining Over Resampling: Test-Time Self-Correction for LLM Reasoning

arXiv:2608. 05643v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Test-time scaling improves LLM reasoning by using additional inference compute, but wider sampling alone can suffer from diminishing returns: new rollouts often repeat existing answer patterns instead of adding useful reasoning diversity.

By Ahsan Bilal, Muhammad Ahmed Mohsin, Muhammad Umer, Lena Trigg, Ali Subhan, Muhammad Ali, Dean F. Hougen
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Oct 8

Scaling to Tens of Thousands of Test-Time Iterations with Loop-Native Attention Residuals

The paper proposes InfiLoop, a loop-native residual connection designed for looped Transformers to prevent performance degradation as iterations increase. InfiLoop learns which past computations to retain and how much to accept from each new update, using content-based weighting and learned temporal decay to maintain a running summary of recurrent states. The approach yields strong results on reasoning tasks, achieving 97.9% exact accuracy on Sudoku-Extreme and 13.6% pass@2 on ARC-AGI-2, and continues to improve with over 20,000 test-time iterations.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

When Recursive Models Finish Computing

arXiv:2609.26487v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recursive models can continue updating their latent states beyond their nominal inference budget, so an incorrect output at that budget does not show w...

By Hare Krishna, Shubham Singh, Stephen Ebert, Hao-Yu Sun