arXiv AI

RoboVAD: A Large Cross-Domain Evaluation Benchmark for Anomaly Detection in Robotic Arm Manipulation Videos

RoboVAD is a large-scale benchmark for video anomaly detection in robotic arm manipulation, featuring cross-domain evaluation where both tasks and anomaly types are unseen during training. The dataset challenges existing VAD methods, with state-of-the-art approaches, including a new method tailored for robotic arms, still achieving less than 70% micro-averaged frame-level AUC in the hardest setting. The authors provide the dataset and code publicly for further research.

arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 25

Frame-Level Evaluation in Weakly Supervised Video Anomaly Detection Mostly Measures Video-Level Ranking

The paper investigates how weakly supervised video anomaly detectors, trained with only video‑level labels, are evaluated using frame‑level metrics such as Micro‑AUROC and AP. It shows that these metrics largely measure a detector’s ability to separate different videos rather than correctly ordering anomalous moments within a single video, a phenomenon termed temporal dilution. Experiments demonstrate that a detector can achieve high pooled scores even when it assigns the same score to every frame in a video, indicating that current evaluation practices may overstate temporal localization performance.

By Inpyo Song, Jangwon Lee
arXiv AI
Jun 30

RoboGaze: Evaluating Robot World Models via Structured Vision-Language Analysis

arXiv:2606. 28385v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent advances in robot world models enable synthetic video generation for embodied prediction and planning.

By Minh-Loi Nguyen, Nghiem Tuong Diep, Hung Khang Nguyen, Minh Le, Doanh Le Thien, Hoang H. Tran, Dung D. Le, Vu N. Duong, Daniel Sonntag, An Thai Le, Duy Minh Ho Nguyen, Vien Anh Ngo, Tran Van Nhiem
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 2

ZimaBlue: Evolving Generalizable World Action Models through Scalable Video Pre-training

ZimaBlue is a scalable framework that learns generalizable World Action Models (WAMs) from large-scale egocentric videos. It follows a three-stage curriculum: causal video pre‑training, video‑action mid‑training with a unified action representation, and final specialization to a target robot. The system employs an asynchronous Slow‑Fast architecture to enable real‑time 30 Hz action prediction, achieving a jump in real‑robot zero‑shot success from 36.1% to 77.8% when leveraging over 120,000 hours of embodied video.

By Xionghao Wu, Yijun Yang, Shiyang Zhou, Haoze Sun, Jianhui Liu, Songsong Yu, Jiyao Zhang, Wenbo Li, Bo Wang, Guoqing Ma, Lin Song, Renjie Liao, Shenghe Zheng, Wei Tang, Xiaojuan Qi, Yanwei Li, Yuan Zhang, Zhuotao Tian, Haoyang Huang, Nan Duan
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 5

VQ-VAD: Vector-quantized Motion Representation Learning for Human-centric Video Anomaly Detection

Video Anomaly Detection (VAD) is inherently challenging due to the scarcity of anomalies and the large visual variability in surveillance footage, including changes in lighting, viewpoint, and human appearance. To mitigate visual noise and address privacy concerns, recent work has shifted to pose-based VAD, which focuses on motion dynamics rather than raw video data.

arXiv AI
Aug 6

VQ-VAD: Vector-quantized Motion Representation Learning for Human-centric Video Anomaly Detection

arXiv:2608. 05069v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Video Anomaly Detection (VAD) is inherently challenging due to the scarcity of anomalies and the large visual variability in surveillance footage, including changes in lighting, viewpoint, and human appearance.

By Narges Rashvand, Ghazal Alinezhad Noghre, Shanle Yao, Gabriel Maldonado, Hamed Tabkhi
arXiv AI
Sep 4

FailBench: How Reliable are VLMs at Judging Robot Task Success?

FailBench is a new benchmark for robot failure detection, containing 2,197 manipulation attempts from 14 public sources, with 75% of failures occurring naturally. The study evaluates 13 vision‑language model (VLM) detectors, finding the best model achieves only 0.77 mean balanced accuracy, and that fine‑tuned failure detectors often underperform general‑purpose VLMs. Performance varies with visual evidence, excelling when object motion is observable but dropping to near chance on contact‑intensive assembly tasks, and input‑level cropping of outcome‑relevant regions improves the top detector by 2.4 percentage points.

By Zaruhi Navasardyan, Tatul Danielyan, Hrant Davtyan