arXiv:2606. 31653v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Certified training aims to produce models whose predictions can be formally verified against adversarial perturbations, typically by optimising upper bounds on the worst-case loss over an allowed perturbation set.
By Matteo Melis, Jesus Martinez Del Rincon, Vishal Sharma
The paper introduces Conflict‑Aware Evidential Deep Learning (C‑EDL), a lightweight post‑hoc method that improves uncertainty quantification for deep learning models. C‑EDL applies diverse, task‑preserving transformations to each input and uses representational disagreement to adjust predictions, thereby reducing overconfident errors on adversarial and out‑of‑distribution data. Experiments demonstrate that C‑EDL outperforms existing Evidential Deep Learning variants and baselines, achieving up to 55 % reduction in coverage for OOD data and 90 % for adversarial data across multiple datasets and attack types.
By Charmaine Barker, Daniel Bethell, Simos Gerasimou
arXiv:2512. 12997v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: CLIP delivers strong zero-shot classification but remains highly vulnerable to adversarial attacks.
By Wenjing Lu, Zerui Tao, Yuning Qiu, Dongping Zhang, Yang Yang, Qibin Zhao
arXiv:2608. 10372v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-hoc calibration aligns a classifier's predicted confidences with its empirical accuracy without retraining.
By Lening Zhao, Qipeng Zhan, Li Shen
arXiv:2606. 01437v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are highly susceptible to adversarial perturbations, leading to extensive research on robustness for safety-critical applications.
By Daniel Sadig, Mohammadreza Maleki, Hamed Karimi, Reza Samavi
arXiv:2607. 03075v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Safety-critical applications require classifiers that are both robust and reliable.
By Nicolas Sournac, Ahmed Baha Ben Jmaa, Bertrand Braeckeveldt
arXiv:2608. 09768v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A prediction that is both confident and wrong is a critical reliability failure because it can bypass abstention and human review precisely when the model is mistaken.
By Ange-Cl\'ement Akazan, Ineza Remy Mugenga, Abebe Geletu, Jean Medard Ngnotchouye, Issa Karambal
The paper introduces CLEAR, a lightweight, task‑agnostic post‑hoc method that enhances evidential robustness in deep learning models without retraining. CLEAR uses held‑out calibration data to map the geometry of the model’s latent space, then generates perturbation views at inference to detect latent conflict. When high conflict is found, CLEAR selectively reduces evidential strength while preserving evidence for latent‑consistent inputs, achieving significant improvements in OOD and adversarial AUROC on ImageNet→CUB and running much faster than competing methods.
By Charmaine Barker, Daniel Bethell, Simos Gerasimou
arXiv:2606. 18860v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reliable pixel-level uncertainty quantification holds the potential to transform clinical workflows by enabling high-fidelity longitudinal monitoring and distinguishing true pathological changes from artifacts.
By Hana Jebril, Thomas Pinetz, G\"unter Klambauer, Hrvoje Bogunovi\'c
arXiv:2605. 30188v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reliable probability estimates are critical in many machine learning applications, yet modern classifiers are often poorly calibrated.
By Eug\`ene Berta, David Holzm\"uller, Francis Bach, Michael I. Jordan
arXiv:2607. 04145v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Adversarial attacks guide and provide additional training and test data for both adversarial training and adversarial robustness validation, and expose the 'piecewise linearity' of deep learning based models.
By Naman Goyal, Milan Chaudhari
arXiv:2606. 08467v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While confidence calibration is essential for trustworthy decision-making in safety-critical applications, the robustness of calibrated GNNs to adversarial structural perturbations remains largely unexplored.
By Cuong Dang, Jiahao Zhang, Hieu Ta Quang, Dung Le, Lu Cheng, Suhang Wang