arXiv:2609.37959v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Tabular machine learning typically relies on per-dataset workflows, fitting tree ensembles or running AutoML searches from scratch for every task. We p...
By Weihao Kong, Erez Louidor Ilan, Shuxin Nie, Taman Narayan, Rajat Sen, Yichen Zhou, Deqing Fu, Samet Oymak, Abhimanyu Das
arXiv:2605. 24417v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Supervised classification on tabular data remains a central machine learning task, but its dependence on large labeled datasets limits its applicability in data-scarce settings.
By Daria Grushina, Kseniia Kuvshinova, Alina Kostromina, Aziz Temirkhanov, Mile Mitrovic, Dmitry Simakov
arXiv:2608. 02412v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have become the default tool for a remarkable range of tasks, yet they have had conspicuously little success at one of the most common machine learning workloads: predictive analytics over tabular data.
By Marta Garnelo, Wojciech M. Czarnecki
arXiv:2608. 10149v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Due to the diversity of real-world time series, no single forecasting model consistently dominates across all samples.
By Xu Zhang, Chang Xu, Hui Sun, Nan Ma, Zijian Zhang, Peng Wang, Wei Wang, Li Zhao
Xiaomi-TabLDM is a tabular foundation model that performs classification and regression via in-context learning without task‑specific fine‑tuning. It is pretrained solely on synthetic data from structural causal models, achieving top‑ranked regression results on multiple benchmarks while reducing training and prediction time compared to leading models. The architecture incorporates a three‑stage training strategy, dual‑stream feature grouping, lightweight attention residuals, and sparse mixture‑of‑experts, and it can further improve accuracy through test‑time compute scaling.
By TabLDM Team, Penghui Wang, Wei Liu, Hong Wang, Chengyue Huang, Yuxi Sun, Zirui Wang, Hongming Huang, Quan Wang, Chunxiao Liu, Erli Meng, Bin Wang
arXiv:2608. 06137v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tabular data are ubiquitous in real-world applications and are crucial for data-driven prediction and decision-making across science, industry, finance, healthcare, and public services.
By Yi He, Zhengkang Guan, Anpeng Wu, Peng Cui, Fei Wu, Kun Kuang
The report introduces TabPFN‑3.5, a new flagship tabular foundation model that outperforms its predecessor TabPFN‑3 and all existing baselines on a wide range of tabular tasks. It achieves state‑of‑the‑art performance on standard tabular prediction in TabArena and extends to practical scenarios such as non‑i.i.d. data, temporal or grouped splits, tables containing strings, text, images, high‑cardinality categorical features, and wide tables. Variants like TabPFN‑3.5‑Fast, TabPFN‑3.5‑Plus, and TabPFN‑3.5‑Thinking offer faster inference, expanded multimodal capabilities, and further speed improvements up to 12× faster than the previous Thinking mode.
By Benjamin J\"ager, Nick Erickson, L\'eo Grinsztajn, Felix Birkel, Klemens Fl\"oge, Oscar Key, K\"ur\c{s}at Kaya, Jonas K\"ubler, Ad\`ele Frankel, Tobias Schr\"oder, Anurag Garg, Jan Hendrik Metzen, David Salinas, Simon Bing, Kristina Collins, Tuana \c{C}elik, Vahid Balazadeh, Lydia Sidhoum, Tom\'as Pereda, Brendan Roof, Andrej Tschalzev, Siyuan Guo, Philipp Singer, Lennart Purucker, Jake Robertson, Marie Salmon, Philipp Jund, Jerry Chen, Diana Kriuchkova, Arthur Cahu, Eliott Kalfon, Adrian Hayler, Georg Grab, Vitor Monteiro, Lilly Wehrhahn, Dominik Safaric, Clara Cornu, Alan Arazi, Rylee Grace, Simone Alessi, Mihir Manium, Bernhard Sch\"olkopf, Yann LeCun, Madelon Hulsebos, Sauraj Gambhir, Noah Hollmann, Frank Hutter
arXiv:2605. 18383v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We present TabH2O, a foundation model for tabular data that performs classification and regression in a single forward pass via in-context learning.
By Pascal Pfeiffer, Dmitry Gordeev, Mathias M\"uller, Laura Fink, Joan Salv\`a Soler, Mark Landry, Branden Murray, Marcos V. Conde, Sri Satish Ambati
arXiv:2609.16309v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Despite the rapid progress of LLM-based agents for planning, code generation, and debugging, their practical value for tabular machine learning remains...
By Renat Sergazinov, Artem Chistyakov, Sergey Pankevich, Artem Babenko
The paper investigates whether training classical machine learning models remains worthwhile when large language models (LLMs) can label tabular data without training. By defining a labeled‑data crossover point (N*) where a trained classical model surpasses a frozen LLM’s flat error, the authors analyze 126 student evaluations of GPT models across 18 datasets and compare them to power‑law learning curves of six classical model families. Results show that in 86% of cases a classical model outperforms the LLM with no more labeled data than already available, and the crossover occurs at a median of about 6% of the training set, suggesting that collecting a few hundred labels and training a gradient‑boosted model is typically advantageous.
By Kaihua Ding
arXiv:2604. 22328v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Driven by the transition towards a climate-neutral energy system, accurate energy time series forecasting is critical for planning and operations.
By Marco Obermeier, Marco Pruckner, Florian Haselbeck, Andreas Zeiselmair
GENSCRIPT is an inference‑only pipeline that generates synthetic data without training a generative model. It creates a deterministic statistical profile of the source data, uses a language model to infer field semantics and cross‑column constraints, and then compiles these into an executable sampler that works for single‑table, temporal, and relational data. The method builds generators in minutes, samples large datasets quickly, and achieves fidelity comparable to leading methods while preserving key data relationships such as 1‑to‑1 mappings and primary‑foreign key constraints.
By Zilong Zhao, Abdul Raheem, Jiayu Li, Sohei Arisaka, Darius Lim Hong Yi, Milad Abdollahzadeh, Uzair Javaid, Biplab Sikdar