The paper introduces Dynamic Alignment Compensation (DAC), a training‑free inference‑time technique designed to reduce hallucinations in Large Vision‑Language Models (LVLMs). DAC monitors cross‑modal representation drift across decoder layers and generation steps, applying lightweight residual compensation through Layer‑wise Semantic Compensation and Sequential Semantic Correction. Experiments on nine multimodal benchmarks across various LVLM backbones demonstrate that DAC consistently lowers hallucination rates while preserving overall performance.
By Kairong Yu, Zixin Zhu, Le Yu, Hongwei Wang
The paper introduces the concept of multi-view hallucination (MVH), where large vision-language models produce incorrect answers when processing images from multiple viewpoints. It presents MVH-Bench, a benchmark of 4.8k question-answer pairs that target cross-instance and cross-view hallucinations, and shows that MVH is common across recent models. The authors propose Reference Shift Contrastive Decoding (RSCD), a training-free decoding method that mitigates visual interference, achieving significant performance gains on MVH-Bench with LLaVA-OneVision and Qwen2.5-VL.
By Wooje Park, Insu Lee, Soohyun Kim, Jaeyun Jang, Minyoung Noh, Kyuhong Shim, Byonghyo Shim
The article surveys hallucination issues in Large Vision‑Language Models (LVLMs), a type of multimodal foundation model that blends visual data with large language models. It categorizes hallucination causes into model architecture and data quality, presents a taxonomy of mitigation strategies, and critically evaluates existing evaluation benchmarks from both discriminative and generative viewpoints. The survey also outlines open challenges and future research directions to improve LVLM reliability and trustworthiness.
By Yinghao Guo, Wei Lan, Wenyi Chen, Qingfeng Chen, Shichao Zhang, Shirui Pan, Huiyu Zhou, Yi Pan
arXiv:2606. 09859v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: MLLMs frequently hallucinate objects inconsistent with visual inputs.
By Yingxuan Zhuang, Jingxiao Yang, Miao Pan, Cheng Tan, Yuxiang Cai, Siwei Tan, Chen Zhi, Xuhong Zhang, Jianwei Yin, Jintao Chen
ReWEIGH the Evidence is a training‑free decoding technique that calibrates token‑level ordinal visual evidence to reduce hallucinations in large vision‑language models. It aggregates vocabulary ranks across visual positions, compares candidates to a token‑specific reference derived from unlabeled images, and applies a bounded penalty only when evidence falls below this reference. Experiments on four 7B backbones show up to a 21.3% reduction in hallucinated object mentions while largely preserving or improving descriptive and general performance, with minimal added latency.
By Jihae Jeong, Junha Choi, Hwanjo Yu
arXiv:2605. 08245v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) increasingly power high-stakes applications, from medical imaging to autonomous systems, yet they routinely hallucinate, confidently describing content not present in the input.
By Harshvardhan Saini, Samyak Jha, Yiming Tang, Dianbo Liu
arXiv:2608. 10835v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) achieve impressive visual reasoning and dialogue capabilities, yet frequently hallucinate content unsupported by the visual input.
By Dvir Samuel, Guy Bar-Shalom, Fabrizio Frasca, Ethan Fetaya, Yftah Ziser, Gal Chechik, Haggai Maron
The paper introduces AIMS (Adaptive Information Multi-source Steering), a lightweight, training‑free framework that dynamically balances visual, prefilled textual, and generated contexts during decoding to reduce hallucinations in Large Vision‑Language Models (LVLMs). By constructing compact prototypes for each context domain and estimating their affinities with the current query, AIMS assigns head‑wise steering weights that guide adaptive context integration without extra training or forward passes. Experiments across multiple LVLMs and decoding strategies show that AIMS effectively mitigates object hallucination while preserving general multimodal performance.
By Shuran Ma, JiaLe Li, Yuxin Dong, Shan Zheng, Qingyun Jiang, Xiang Chen, Qi Zhu, Deyi Ji, Yifan Yang, Jianfeng Pan, Yu Tian, Xue Yang
arXiv:2608. 07302v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) often suffer from object hallucination, generating objects that are absent from the image.
By Zichuan Wang, Songlin Yang, Bo Peng, Zhenchen Tang, Yang Li, Beibei Dong, Jing Dong
arXiv:2608. 08167v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) excel at open-ended captioning and visual QA but often describe objects, attributes, or relations absent from the image, a phenomenon known as object hallucination.
By Ameen Ali, Tamim Zoabi, Lidor Brami, Lior Wolf
arXiv:2606. 07647v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large vision language models (LVLMs) have made rapid advancements and are deployed across various applications, yet hallucinations remain a major challenge.
By Ruipeng Zhang, Zhihao Li, C. L. Philip Chen, Tong Zhang
arXiv:2505. 12343v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite the impressive capabilities of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), they remain susceptible to hallucinations, where generated content is inconsistent with the input image.
By Kai Tang, Jinhao You, Yichen Guo, Yiding Sun, Dongxu Zhang, Wenya Wang, Hanze Li, Tao Luo, Renyuan Li, Xiande Huang