arXiv:2606. 10660v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI inference services -- API subscriptions, enterprise chat tools, and SaaS products with embedded AI features -- fall unambiguously within Scope 3 Category 1 under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which requires disclosure for fiscal years starting January 2024.
By Guillermo Llopis (SOMA AI, Barcelona)
arXiv:2606. 05420v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid proliferation of hyperscale data centers (HDCs) in the US, mainly driven by the adoption of artificial intelligence, has raised concerns about this industry's environmental footprint.
By Gianluca Guidi, Francesca Dominici, Tiziano Squartini, Callaway Sprinkle, Jonathan Gilmour, Kevin Butler, Eric Bell, Scott Delaney, Falco J. Bargagli-Stoffi
arXiv:2511. 05613v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Foundation models are increasingly central to high-stakes AI systems, and governance frameworks now depend on evaluations to assess their risks and capabilities.
By Anka Reuel, Avijit Ghosh, Jenny Chim, Andrew Tran, Yanan Long, Jennifer Mickel, Usman Gohar, Srishti Yadav, Pawan Sasanka Ammanamanchi, Mowafak Allaham, Hossein A. Rahmani, Mubashara Akhtar, Felix Friedrich, Robert Scholz, Michael Alexander Riegler, Jan Batzner, Eliya Habba, Arushi Saxena, Anastassia Kornilova, Kevin Wei, Prajna Soni, Yohan Mathew, Kevin Klyman, Jeba Sania, Subramanyam Sahoo, Olivia Beyer Bruvik, Pouya Sadeghi, Sujata Goswami, Angelina Wang, Yacine Jernite, Zeerak Talat, Stella Biderman, Mykel Kochenderfer, Sanmi Koyejo, Irene Solaiman
arXiv:2606. 00811v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Data centers now account for 4.
By Dana Golden, Aruna Balasubramanian, Niranjan Balasubramanian
SustainAI is a water‑aware, closed‑loop framework that embeds environmental accountability into AI deployment. It combines real‑time water metering, a hallucination‑aware penalty model, and a water‑aware routing algorithm that considers regional water stress. In tests with small language models, water footprints varied 11‑fold across data centers, and 1,335 inference runs consumed about 399 mL of water but yielded only 240 correct outputs, highlighting the resource cost of inaccurate responses.
By Farnaz Farid, Tashfia Towkee, Sania Nasreen, Sami bin Azad
arXiv:2511. 19277v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Global greenhouse gas emissions estimates are essential for monitoring and mitigation planning.
By Brittany V. Lancellotti, Jordan M. Malof, Aaron Davitt, Gavin McCormick, Shelby Anderson, Pol Carb\'o-Mestre, Gary Collins, Verity Crane, Zoheyr Doctor, George Ebri, Kevin Foster, Trey M. Gowdy, Michael Guzzardi, John Heal, Heather Hunter, David Kroodsma, Khandekar Mahammad Galib, Paul J. Markakis, Gavin McDonald, Daniel P. Moore, Eric D. Nguyen, Sabina Parvu, Michael Pekala, Christine D. Piatko, Amy Piscopo, Mark Powell, Krsna Raniga, Elizabeth P. Reilly, Michael Robinette, Ishan Saraswat, Patrick Sicurello, Isabella S\"oldner-Rembold, Raymond Song, Charlotte Underwood, Kyle Bradbury
arXiv:2602. 00056v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large-scale data has fuelled the success of frontier artificial intelligence (AI) models over the past decade.
By Sophia N. Wilson, Sebastian Mair, Mophat Okinyi, Erik B. Dam, Janin Koch, Raghavendra Selvan
The paper introduces ARGUS, a language‑model pipeline that audits evidence for identification assumptions in difference‑in‑differences studies of climate policy. ARGUS evaluates reported evidence against an eleven‑dimension rubric, abstaining when evidence cannot be retrieved. In tests, ARGUS detects 73% of injected flaws versus 18% for a keyword approach, abstains on about 40% of assessments in 26 economics papers, and often assigns higher risk than human labels in a five‑paper pilot.
By Yonghong Zhang, Yong Xie, Isabel M. Parra, Ricardo Correia
The paper reviews 194 papers on using artificial intelligence to optimize data center energy use, coding 63 of them. It finds that most control studies validate only in simulation, none consider water withdrawal or embodied carbon, and savings estimates overlap across methods, preventing ranking. The authors propose CLEAR‑DC, a framework that links control and workload demand through elasticity, reports net benefits, and records energy, carbon, water, embodied share, and validation venue.
By Mohammed Basharath Ullah, Summaiya Unnisa Begum, Mohammed Nadeem Ullah
arXiv:2607. 02531v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Water use by data centers is routinely reported as a single footprint, but water is consumed through two physically distinct pathways: at the site for cooling and in the power system that generates electricity.
By Gianluca Guidi, Francesca Dominici
arXiv:2608. 12915v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid growth of LLM inference is shifting sustainability concerns from one-time training to continuous serving, where infrastructure decisions shape energy use, carbon emissions, water consumption, and service quality.
By Nicoletta Tsiopani, Moysis Symeonides, George Pallis, Marios D. Dikaiakos
CityLearn v3 is a configurable simulation and evaluation framework designed for realistic control studies of renewable energy communities (RECs). It models dynamic participation, equipment availability, service deadlines, and data quality, allowing for flexible-load deadlines, demand-response requests, local energy sharing, and failure scenarios within a single environment. The framework records controller inputs, distinguishes requested actions from applied ones, and provides reference controllers, performance indicators, and trajectory exports for comprehensive comparisons across communities.
By Tiago Fonseca, Luis Lino Ferreira, Armando Sousa, Ava Mohammadi, Zoltan Nagy