arXiv Computer Vision

VisDocAgentBench: Benchmarking Agents for Visually Rich Document Retrieval

arXiv AI
Jun 16

TechRAG: Evidence-Gated Multimodal Agentic RAG for Technical Literature Reasoning

arXiv:2606. 01613v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This paper presents an agentic multimodal retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework for domain-specific literature reasoning, instantiated on a curated corpus of several thousand papers in intelligent tires, vehicle dynamics, vehicle control, sensing, estimation, and machine learning.

By Kanwar Bharat Singh
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 21

Doc-V*:Coarse-to-Fine Interactive Visual Reasoning for Multi-Page Document VQA

arXiv:2604. 13731v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multi-page Document Visual Question Answering requires reasoning over semantics, layouts, and visual elements in long, visually dense documents.

By Yuanlei Zheng, Pei Fu, Hang Li, Ziyang Wang, Yuyi Zhang, Wenyu Ruan, Xiaojin Zhang, Zhongyu Wei, Zhenbo Luo, Jian Luan, Wei Chen, Xiang Bai
arXiv Computer Vision
4d ago

ConceptFormer: Learning Adaptive Latent Concepts for Query-Document Alignment in Visual Document Retrieval

arXiv:2608.15698v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Visual document retrieval is a critical component of multimodal retrieval-augmented generation, aiming to identify query-relevant pages from docume...

By Chunyi Peng, Zhipeng Xu, Yukun Yan, Zhenghao Liu, Shi Yu, Sen Mei, Yubo Sun, Yongheng Zhang, Jie Zhou, Yu Gu, Ge Yu, Maosong Sun
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 6

Hierarchical Evidence-Driven Reasoning for Long Document Understanding

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) streamlines long-document understanding by leveraging retrieval mechanisms to restrict input images to a highly curated subset. However, existing multimodal RAG pipelines primarily face two critical challenges: first, standard semantic similarity retrievers frequently fetch topically overlapping yet answer-void distractor pages that mislead downstream generation; second, rigid single-pass pipelines heavily depend on initial retrieval success, where any omission of core evidence inevitably causes cascading errors.