ReCAST is a method for assigning credit to multiple rewards during diffusion model training by using a reward-by-timestep weight matrix that respects user-specified reward budgets while ensuring equal total weight per denoising step. It allocates weight based on each reward’s informativeness, measured by its Rényi discriminability gain at each step, allowing rewards to contribute more when they are most informative. Experiments on SD3.5‑Medium with two four‑reward settings show that ReCAST improves or matches training rewards, enhances held‑out judges, and is preferred by an independent LLM‑as‑a‑Judge, indicating generalizable benefits.
arXiv:2607. 07693v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for aligning generative models with human preferences.
arXiv:2609.33803v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reward models underpin the alignment of large language models, yet the dominant designs reduce each prompt--response pair to a point estimate...
arXiv:2608. 03929v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Aligning diffusion models with human preferences usually relies on a sparse terminal reward evaluated on the final generated samples, presenting a severe temporal credit-assignment challenge across the multi-step denoising process.
arXiv:2608. 16072v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) with group-relative advantages has become the de facto standard for post-training language model reasoners.
The paper introduces Reinforcement Learning with Decomposed Subtasks (RLDS), a method that splits trajectory rewards into per‑subtask shares before policy updates, replacing the scalar advantage used in Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). RLDS employs Subtask‑Decomposed Advantage Estimation (SDAE) to compute group‑relative advantages and distribute credit to tokens based on subtask importance, focusing on steps where a reflection marks a subtask as consequential. Experiments on four benchmarks—FrozenLake, HotpotQA, ScienceWorld, and DeepResearch—show that RLDS improves performance on high‑heterogeneity tasks (ScienceWorld and FrozenLake) and is more compute‑efficient than scalar GRPO for long rollouts.
arXiv:2606. 19162v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Score- and flow-matching models often rely on preference-based reinforcement learning for two purposes: aligning with subjective preferences and, surprisingly, recovering properties such as visual realism and coherent object structure that matching-based training is intended to learn from the data itself.
arXiv:2608. 05111v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In partially observable reinforcement learning, agents face a dual bottleneck: they must explore to encounter rewarding states and retain that experience in memory to optimize their policies.
LLM-as-judge is essential for evaluating open-ended text and steering post-training, yet improving the judge itself typically relies on expensive annotations, reward models, or distillation from stron...
arXiv:2608. 03092v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We aim to improve model performance in multi-reward reinforcement learning training process.
The paper introduces UECR-GRPO, a method that unifies on‑policy distillation and verifier‑based reinforcement learning for mathematical reasoning. It combines verifier rewards and teacher‑derived log‑ratios into a single KL‑regularized objective (Path‑Utility Unification) and then redistributes credit at the token level using entropy‑calibrated redistribution, preserving total task credit. Experiments on five benchmarks show that UECR‑GRPO improves average accuracy by up to 0.89 percentage points over the best baseline for both Qwen3‑1.7B and Qwen3‑4B students.
arXiv:2606. 00291v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In RLHF, each training example contains a prompt $x$ and two candidate responses $y,y'$, and annotators provide pairwise preferences between these responses.
arXiv:2608. 05102v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Long-horizon search agents must make multiple sequential actions (steps) to search, retrieve, verify, and integrate evidence to reach a final answer.