arXiv:2608. 01575v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Whether large language models perform genuine algorithmic reasoning or mere pattern completion is hard to test, because most benchmarks lack a ground truth for correct inductive inference.
By Hector Zenil, Luan Ozelim
arXiv:2510. 08647v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent developments have enabled advanced reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) via long Chain-of-Thought (CoT), trading efficiency during inference for performance.
By Chengzhengxu Li, Xiaoming Liu, Zhaohan Zhang, Shengchao Liu, Guoxin Ma, Yu Lan, Cong Wang, Chao Shen
arXiv:2606. 25432v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Inference efficiency is typically pursued by shrinking the model: distillation, pruning, quantization, and sparse routing each lower per-token cost while treating token count as fixed.
By DatologyAI, :, Matthew L. Leavitt, Siddharth Joshi, Haoli Yin, Rishabh Adiga, Haakon Mongstad, Alvin Deng, David Schwab, Bogdan Gaza, Ari Morcos
arXiv:2606. 29278v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce the Complexity Ceiling Benchmark (CCB), a controlled evaluation of how language-model reasoning decays as the number of required sequential steps grows.
By Shubh Chapra, Dhruv Kumar, Murari Mandal, Yash Sinha
arXiv:2606. 30128v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting improves LLM reasoning, but the source is contested: do the intermediate steps help because they carry useful semantic content, or because conditioning on more tokens buys extra computation before the model commits to an answer?
By Wenlong Wang, Fergal Reid
arXiv:2606. 06920v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deploying Small Language Models (SLMs) on edge devices requires efficient fine-tuning strategies that adapt models to new tasks without degrading their general capabilities.
By Rahul Nair, Chun Tao
Large reasoning models (LRMs) often improve math and coding performance, but their effect on instruction following is unclear. We study IFEval with Qwen3 models (1.
arXiv:2505. 12992v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Inference-time scaling techniques have significantly bolstered the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by harnessing additional computational effort at inference without retraining.
By Baohao Liao, Hanze Dong, Yuhui Xu, Doyen Sahoo, Christof Monz, Junnan Li, Caiming Xiong
arXiv:2606. 07720v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning abilities on mathematical and multi-hop planning tasks.
By Mujtaba Farhan, Maheep Chaudhary
arXiv:2608. 11233v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A dense, pretrained language model can be retrofitted with recurrent depth and learn an iterative latent transition that persists after outcome-only annealing.
By Mark Shapiro
arXiv:2606. 17648v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Standard accuracy metrics cannot explain why LLMs handle variable tracking but fail on semantically equivalent loops.
By Siyue Chen, Yifu Guo, Yuquan Lu, Zishan Xu, Jiaye Lin, Jianbo Lin, Siyu Zhang, Cheng Yang, Junxin Li, Yujia Li, Yu Huo, Ruixuan Wang
Inference efficiency is typically pursued by shrinking the model: distillation, pruning, quantization, and sparse routing each lower per-token cost while treating token count as fixed. But output length has been inflating, and it is precisely the component the standard toolkit leaves untouched.