arXiv:2608. 16416v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Automated machine learning (AutoML) systems search for pipelines within a space of preprocessing operators, learners, and hyper-parameters specified in advance: they can select and tune known components, but cannot produce structure outside that space.
By Sofoklis Kitharidis, Cor J. Veenman, Jan N. van Rijn, Thomas B\"ack, Niki van Stein
The paper investigates code-level autonomous research loops (ARLs) where a language model edits training pipelines to improve an in-loop metric. It identifies a failure mode called algorithmic mode collapse, where edits become semantically uniform despite surface diversity, leading to a growing gap between in-loop gains and independent evaluation. The authors propose Diversity‑Aware Proposal Sampling (DAPS), a lightweight method that reduces semantic decay by 69.1% and boosts faithfulness by over 80% while maintaining optimization speed.
By Bowei He, Weixu Zhang, Yili Jin, Xue Liu
arXiv:2606. 31270v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Computer-use agents, which leverage multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to operate computers and complete tasks, have attracted significant attention for their utility and versatility.
By Xueqiao Sun, Xiaohan Wang, Ludwig Schmidt, Serena Yeung-Levy, Yuhui Zhang
arXiv:2607. 22688v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-training agents for automated AI research requires optimizing not only model parameters, but also the runtime harness that shapes how research trajectories are generated, evaluated, and learned from.
By Zhengyu Chen, Teng Xiao, Huaisheng Zhu, Yige Yuan, Luan Zhang, Jingang Wang
arXiv:2607. 19386v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cross-paper comparison of sparse autoencoder (SAE) interpretability often relies on autointerpretability scores.
By Sinie van der Ben, Neele Roch, Anna Hedstr\"om, Mennatallah El-Assady
arXiv:2608. 08700v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reliable evaluation of tool routing is critical as Large Language Models increasingly operate as autonomous agents.
By Dongjie Xu, Julius, Hanchi Dong, Minghua Tang, Yuxuan Sun, Ziwei Nie, Zicheng Liu, Dujun Qing, Jiajie Xu
arXiv:2506. 01584v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Developing machine learning (ML) systems for real-world deployment requires navigating context-dependent trade-offs among accuracy, fairness, stability, and other objectives.
By Denys Herasymuk, Anastasiia Mozghova, Nazar Protsiv, Vladyslav Sydorak, Julia Stoyanovich
arXiv:2603. 17216v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: With the advent of AI agents, automated scientific discovery is becoming an increasingly plausible goal.
By Ziyang Cai, Amir Saeidi, Harkirat Behl
arXiv:2606. 11616v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-quality training data is essential for the success of machine learning models.
By Jiale Deng, Yanyan Shen, Xiaogang Shi, Chai Junjun
Ecdysis is a framework for training runtime harnesses for large language model agents more efficiently. It distinguishes between model‑specific issues and systematic harness deficiencies by aggregating failures across multiple task instances and uses Failure‑Driven Collaborative Refinement to diagnose and fix harness problems. The approach reduces training time by up to 1.84× and improves harness reasoning accuracy by 18.56%.
Ecdysis is a framework for training runtime harnesses for large language model agents that reduces training time and improves performance. It distinguishes between model‑specific issues and systematic harness deficiencies by aggregating failures across multiple task instances and uses Failure‑Driven Collaborative Refinement to diagnose and correct harness problems. Experiments show up to a 1.84× speedup in harness training and an 18.56% increase in reasoning accuracy.
By Ruiqing Yue, Yu Cui, Zhuoyu Sun, Sicheng Pan, Xianhong Xue, Tingyu Li, Ting Li, Wenzhuo Zhu, Yi Chen, Yifei Liu, Baohan Huang, Zhe Cui, Haibin Zhang, Cong Zuo
Scientific and engineering progress is fundamentally a long-horizon iterative process: proposing changes, running experiments, measuring outcomes, and continuously refining artifacts. Yet existing benchmarks for frontier models primarily evaluate either single-turn responses or short-horizon agent trajectories, failing to capture the challenges of sustained iterative improvement over extended time horizons.