arXiv Machine Learning

Generative Learning for Quantum Measurement Design

arXiv:2608. 11396v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Extracting quantum information from a quantum state is a fundamental task of quantum computation, often requiring the estimation of many non-commuting observables under a finite measurement budget.

Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 11

Generative Learning for Quantum Measurement Design

Extracting quantum information from a quantum state is a fundamental task of quantum computation, often requiring the estimation of many non-commuting observables under a finite measurement budget. For both near-term and early fault-tolerant settings, the measurement protocol must balance statistical efficiency against implementation resources such as circuit depth, connectivity, and entangling-gate count.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 2

Latent-Conditioned Parameterized Quantum Circuits as Universal Approximators for Distributions over Quantum States

arXiv:2605. 28690v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Many applications in quantum simulation, quantum chemistry, and quantum machine learning require not a single quantum state but an ensemble of states characterizing the heterogeneity of a target system.

By Quoc Hoan Tran, Koki Chinzei, Yasuhiro Endo, Hirotaka Oshima
arXiv AI
Sep 15

Energy Accuracy Is Not Enough: A Structure-Aware Benchmark and Evaluation Protocol for Quantum Architecture Search

The paper introduces HamQASBench, a structure‑aware benchmark for quantum architecture search that includes eleven molecular Hamiltonians up to fourteen qubits, exact references, and a comprehensive evaluation protocol. The protocol combines energy accuracy, success rates, reference‑relative circuit cost, local entropy profiles for non‑degenerate targets, and state identification within degenerate ground subspaces. Experiments with five methods across four search paradigms show that energy‑only comparisons miss important differences, such as varying gate counts, distinct spin components in degenerate cases, and differing entanglement profiles, while still achieving chemical accuracy on a near‑product instance.

By Jiayang Niu, Akib Karim, Yan Wang, Jie Li, Ke Deng, Azadeh Alavi, Muhammad Usman, Yongli Ren
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 24

An Analytically Trained Variational Surrogate for Quantum Phase Estimation on NISQ Hardware

arXiv:2607. 20943v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE) is a foundational algorithm for molecular ground-state energy estimation, but its deep circuit requirements make direct hardware execution impractical on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices.

By Mousumi Kundu, Ashish Kumar Patra, Anurag K. S. V., Ruchika Bhat, Sai Shankar P., Alok Shukla, Jaiganesh G
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Aug 6

How Much Reconstruction Does Quantum Machine Learning Need? Late Fusion of Independently Trained Quantum Subcircuits

Circuit cutting lets a large quantum neural network (QNN) run as independent subcircuits on small devices, but rebuilding its outputs by reconstruction carries a classical sampling overhead exponential in the number of cuts - the dominant runtime cost in prior work. We ask whether, for machine-learning tasks, this step is necessary, and replace it with late fusion: each subcircuit is trained and measured independently, and a small classical head combines their outputs - a linear-cost, decision-level combination borrowed from multimodal learning.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 26

Tailor Made Embeddings for Quantum Machine Learning

arXiv:2606. 26312v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autoencoders transformed classical machine learning by solving the curse of dimensionality, enabling principled weight initialization and learning compact, structured representations.

By Aldo Lamarre, Dominik \v{S}afr\'anek
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 3

Quantum MeanFlow: single-shot generative sampling on NISQ hardware

Quantum MeanFlow (QMF) is a new quantum generative sampling method that enables single‑step sample generation by learning an average velocity field over a time interval, unlike the multi‑step quantum flow matching (QFM) which requires sequential integration of an ordinary differential equation. Using parameterized quantum circuits, the authors benchmark QMF and QFM on the MNIST dataset, finding that QMF produces lower image quality than multi‑step QFM but outperforms single‑step QFM at every shot count. Both models were executed on IBM quantum computers, and best‑of‑N rejection sampling mitigates device noise without circuit modification, demonstrating QMF’s practicality for efficient single‑step quantum generative sampling.

By Ashish Joshi, Eshaan Mistry, Takahiko Koyama