Deep4ge: DNN Training Trajectories for Fault Detection and Diagnosis
arXiv:2607. 12868v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep learning systems often fail due to subtle implementation faults that alter training behavior.
arXiv:2606. 26492v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep Learning (DL) programs can fail during training for many reasons, and diagnosing the cause is a costly and time-consuming maintenance task.
arXiv:2607. 12868v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep learning systems often fail due to subtle implementation faults that alter training behavior.
TreeFI is a value‑aware statistical fault‑injection technique for FP32 single‑bit faults in deep neural network activations and weights. It partitions each layer’s value distribution into intervals with similar expected bit‑flip behavior using regression trees, then allocates injections across these intervals based on their relevance for failure‑rate estimation. This stratified approach preserves target confidence and error margins while dramatically reducing the required injection budget—up to 72.1× for activations and 11.2× for weights compared to existing baselines.
arXiv:2509. 22267v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Reliable detection of bearing faults is essential for maintaining the safety and operational efficiency of rotating machinery.
arXiv:2607. 20046v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: With the widespread deployment of deep neural networks (DNNs) in safety-critical domains, reducing the cost of model validation under limited testing budgets has become increasingly important.
arXiv:2512. 10485v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vulnerability detection methods based on deep learning (DL) have shown strong performance on benchmark datasets, yet their real-world effectiveness remains underexplored.
arXiv:2607. 05461v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing methods for testing deep neural networks (DNNs) primarily prioritize test inputs likely to reveal model faults under a fixed labeling budget.
arXiv:2606. 24968v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Context: Software defect prediction supports maintenance decisions such as testing prioritization, release-risk assessment, and quality monitoring.
arXiv:2604. 28118v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Transformers now underpin critical AI systems across industry and research.
arXiv:2608. 12144v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Over the past decade, many test adequacy metrics have been proposed for deep learning that characterize test dataset adequacy from different perspectives, e.
Existing methods for testing deep neural networks (DNNs) primarily prioritize test inputs likely to reveal model faults under a fixed labeling budget. In practice, choosing that budget is difficult: too little testing misses failures, while too much incurs unnecessary labeling costs.
arXiv:2607. 11193v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: To ensure the overall quality of AI-enabled software, not only traditional software components but also AI components need to be tested and repaired.
arXiv:2607. 16493v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-task deep learning models that jointly perform fault classification and remaining useful life (RUL) regression are increasingly used in predictive maintenance, yet reported performance can be strongly affected by how sliding-window sequences are split into training and test sets.