The study investigates how pruning affects large language models (LLMs) used for smart‑home tool calling. Researchers examined four LLMs—dense Transformer, dense hybrid, and mixture‑of‑experts (MoE) architectures—using depth, width, hybrid, and expert pruning, followed by supervised fine‑tuning. They evaluated over 19,500 instances from three smart‑home datasets, analyzing not only overall accuracy but also degradation in action components (operation, device, argument, value) and task complexity, finding that dense models suffer sharp performance drops after a narrow safe pruning range, while MoE models tolerate more pruning; aggressive pruning also leads to over‑refusal and loss of grounded specificity.
arXiv:2504.04342v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scaling up model parameters and training data consistently improves the performance of large language models (LLMs), but at the cost of rapidly gro...
arXiv:2606. 01912v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Smart homes are evolving toward complex state-dependent living environments, requiring Large Language Models (LLMs) to reason over user intent, preferences, and multi-device interactions.
arXiv:2606. 01099v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Command understanding systems in smart home ecosystems can automate device control and substantially improve user experience.
arXiv:2603. 18492v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models increase parameter capacity without proportional per-token computation, yet deployment still requires storing the full expert pool, making expert pruning important for reducing memory and serving overhead.
arXiv:2607. 18034v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Smart home assistants interpret a wide range of user commands, from explicit device control to underspecified and preference dependent requests.
The paper introduces HOPE, a second‑order pruning method for Mixture‑of‑Experts language models that accounts for cooperative interactions between experts. Unlike first‑order methods such as REAP, HOPE derives an objective that provably bounds pruning error and is shown to outperform baselines across three large MoE models, multiple calibration sets, and diverse benchmarks, especially at high pruning rates and on agentic tasks. The results demonstrate that preserving expert interactions allows aggressive compression with minimal performance loss on complex workloads.
The paper revisits the impact of pruning on large language models (LLMs) during test-time scaling (TTS). While prior work found that structured pruning degrades reasoning performance, this study shows that unstructured pruning—removing only specific redundant weights—can actually improve TTS performance on reasoning benchmarks for models s1.1-7B and Qwen3-8B, sometimes surpassing the full-weight models. The authors also examine how different layer-wise sparsity allocation strategies affect these outcomes.
arXiv:2606. 18096v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Structured State Space Models (SSMs), including the S4 and S4D architectures, have recently emerged as powerful alternatives to attention-based models for capturing long-range dependencies in sequential data.
arXiv:2606. 27866v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models scale model ability with sparsely activated experts, making this architecture a standard recipe for modern large models.
arXiv:2609.25809v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Fine-grained mixture-of-experts (MoE) architectures have become a mainstream design for open-weight LLMs, with hundreds of experts and increasingly man...
arXiv:2601.06787v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are known to contain significant redundancy, yet a systematic explanation for why certain components, particularly in...
arXiv:2608. 10692v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as mobile assistants, where a key challenge is leveraging personal information scattered across multiple applications (apps) to complete user instructions.