arXiv:2602. 09258v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deployed graph neural networks (GNNs) are frozen at deployment yet must fit clean data, generalize under distribution shifts, and remain stable to perturbations.
By Xiaoguang Guo, Zehong Wang, Jiazheng Li, Shawn Spitzel, Qi Yang, Kaize Ding, Jundong Li, Chuxu Zhang
arXiv:2609.37057v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Achieving strong performance with graph neural networks (GNNs) typically requires training and hyperparameter tuning for each dataset, incurring repeat...
By Dooho Lee, Jinmo Lee, Minho Jeong, Kijung Shin, Jaemin Yoo
SiST‑GNN introduces a simultaneous spatial‑temporal message‑passing framework for dynamic graph neural networks, fusing per‑node temporal embeddings with spatial aggregation in a single operation. By maintaining a recurrent hidden state per node and treating it as a cross‑time edge, the model jointly reasons over topology and evolution. Experiments on link‑prediction and node‑classification benchmarks show significant improvements over prior methods, achieving up to 158% gains in live‑update link prediction and outperforming discrete‑time baselines by 7–23% in dynamic node classification.
By Shubhajit Roy, Anirban Dasgupta
arXiv:2607. 17272v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Node representation learning has advanced rapidly, yet most existing methods rely on per-dataset training and hyperparameter tuning.
By Dooho Lee, Jaemin Yoo
arXiv:2603. 06952v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As graphs scale to billions of nodes and edges, graph Machine Learning workloads are constrained by the cost of multi-hop traversals over exponentially growing neighborhoods.
By Yuhang Song, Naima Abrar Shami, Romaric Duvignau, Vasiliki Kalavri
PreGS is a multi-expert graph neural network that uses parameter transfer from a pre‑trained multi‑head GAT to freeze GraphSAGE experts, creating complementary structural branches. The model fuses raw node features, GAT head outputs, and expert representations through an MLP, then combines the result with pretrained GAT logits. An extended version, PreGSv2, adds source‑level weighting and a structural gating mechanism for adaptive feature integration, and both variants outperform several baseline GNNs on eight public datasets.
By Zhicong Cai, Yinglong Zhang, Xiaoying Hong, Xuewen Xia, Xing Xu
arXiv:2608. 09031v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Graph neural networks typically propagate information through repeated message-passing layers, coupling the distance over which information travels with the number of nonlinear transformations applied.
By Isuru Herath, Arin Gopakumar, Sharan Sahu
arXiv:2607. 13241v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Traffic forecasting is highly challenging due to complex and nonlinear spatial and temporal dependencies.
By Mingxing Xu, Rakesh Chowdary Machineni, Ke Liu, Xi Cheng, Chengqi Lu, Xin Hu, Lyuhao Chen, Xiangyu Li, Junwei You, Oliver Gao
arXiv:2608. 09596v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) suffer from two fundamental limitations: over-smoothing, where node representations become indistinguishable with depth, and over-squashing, where long-range information is compressed through limited message-passing channels.
By Killian Cressant, Pedro B. Velloso
arXiv:2608. 02128v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Training Graph Neural Networks on large graphs is challenged by the memory cost of storing all node representations across layers.
By Antonin Joly, Nicolas Keriven, Aline Roumy
arXiv:2511. 11046v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Graph neural networks (GNNs) have become an indispensable tool for analyzing relational data.
By Brian Godwin Lim, Galvin Brice Lim, Renzo Roel Tan, Irwin King, Kazushi Ikeda
arXiv:2601. 19449v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Graph neural networks (GNNs) are widely believed to excel at node representation learning through trainable neighborhood aggregations.
By Celia Rubio-Madrigal, Rebekka Burkholz