arXiv AI

Do Maps Still Matter for Machines: Revisiting the Role of Choropleth Maps in Foundation Model Spatial Understanding

arXiv:2607. 17999v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Spatial understanding is crucial for foundation models (FMs), and maps have long helped humans organize and reason about geographic information.

arXiv AI
Aug 18

Toward AI-Friendly Cartography: Understanding How Color Design Influences Foundation Model Spatial Reasoning on Sequential Choropleth Maps

arXiv:2608. 15736v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Foundation models (FMs) increasingly support multimodal and geospatial reasoning, yet it remains unclear whether cartographic principles designed for human perception are equally effective for machines.

By Yonghe Sun, Zhenjia Liu, Hua Liao, Wenjia Xu, Nai Yang, Weihua Dong, Zhiwei Wei
arXiv AI
Oct 12

Mind the Spatial Gap: A Benchmark for Geospatial Reasoning and Constrained Spatial Editing

The paper introduces GeoSpatialBench, a benchmark for evaluating spatial reasoning and constrained spatial editing in multimodal large language models. It tests 28 spatial relations across GeoJSON and map image data from six cities, revealing that models perform better on GeoJSON than images and struggle with quantitative metric relations and editing tasks that must satisfy spatial constraints. The study highlights a significant gap between recognizing spatial relations and actively manipulating them in AI systems.

By Zheng Ren, Yanning Wang, Ziheng Huang, Fei Huang, Shiqi Wang, Ziqian Ye, Yang Yue
arXiv AI
Jun 4

From Symbolic to Geometric: Enabling Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models

arXiv:2606. 04381v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent large language models (LLMs) often appear to exhibit spatial reasoning ability; however, this capability is largely \emph{symbolic}, arising from pattern matching over spatial language rather than true \emph{geometric} reasoning over space.

By Chen Chu, Bita Azarijoo, Li Xiong, Khurram Shafique, Cyrus Shahabi
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 3

From Symbolic to Geometric: Enabling Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models

Recent large language models (LLMs) often appear to exhibit spatial reasoning ability; however, this capability is largely \emph{symbolic}, arising from pattern matching over spatial language rather than true \emph{geometric} reasoning over space. Because LLMs operate on discrete tokens, they lack native support for continuous spatial representations, explicit geometric computation, and structured spatial operators.

arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 1

KilometerVision: A New Frontier for Large-Scale Spatial Intelligence in VLMs

arXiv:2609.39588v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We push the frontier of large-scale spatial intelligence in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) and introduce the first benchmark that probes geographical la...

By Aravindh Mahendran, Michael King, Matthew Koichi Grimes, Antoine Yang, Tyler Zhu, Joseph Heyward, Tengda Han, Shiry Ginosar, Chen Sun, Dima Damen, Simon Osindero, Noah Snavely, Simon Lynen, Jo\~ao Carreira, Viorica P\u{a}tr\u{a}ucean
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 30

InsightMap: Structured Spatial Modeling for Embodied Multimodal Reasoning

InsightMap is a framework that uses top‑down maps as explicit spatial memory and action‑conditioned prediction targets for language‑guided navigation. It links historical views to labeled map locations and employs a shared multimodal backbone to jointly learn navigation action prediction and post‑action map generation, providing auxiliary training supervision. The approach supports a unified RGB‑D pipeline for navigation, visual question answering, situated reasoning, and 3D grounding, achieving state‑of‑the‑art results on R2R‑CE, RxR‑CE, ScanQA, SQA3D, ScanRefer, and outperforming baselines on the Unitree Go2 platform.

By Hongpei Zheng, Hujun Yin
arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 12

S-Space: Exploring Spatial Workspace in Multimodal Language Models

The paper introduces S‑Space, a linear subspace within multimodal language models where object‑token representations encode continuous spatial coordinates along horizontal, vertical, and distance axes. This subspace is intrinsic, readable under non‑spatial queries, and serves as an internal spatial workspace: perception maps object locations into it, reasoning transforms it for viewpoint changes, and verbal responses selectively access it. Diagnostic experiments using S‑Space reveal that while models can form spatial representations, they struggle with spatial transformations needed for reliable reasoning across viewpoint changes.

By Zhiyuan Shi, Xiang Li, Xingzhuo Guo, Shangchen Miao, Weiliang Chen, Qiyu Dai, Jinshan Ren, Jiangran Lyu, Fangfu Liu, Mingsheng Long, Jialong Wu