arXiv:2608.29349v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Gaussian process (GP) regression with a single global GP (GP-glo) incurs cubic computational cost, limiting scalability to large datasets. Product-of-e...
By Yean Hoon Ong, Paolo Barucca, Wei Pan, Jun Wang
arXiv:2607. 19498v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Gaussian process (GP) modeling is widely used in computational science and engineering.
By Eric Herrison Gyamfi, Emily L. Kang, Bledar A. Konomi, Guang Lin
arXiv:2606. 01427v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation models (FMs) have achieved substantial success in generalizing across tasks without problemspecific training or fine-tuning.
By Tyler R. Johnson, Kian Ben-Jacob, Nima Negarandeh, Oriol Vendrell-Gallart, Ramin Bostanabad
arXiv:2605. 20145v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Gaussian process (GP) predictive distributions are commonly used in Bayesian optimization (BO) to guide the selection of evaluation points for expensive objective functions.
By Aur\'elien Pion, Emmanuel Vazquez
arXiv:2608. 13793v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning (ML) has become an indispensable part of modern engineering design workflows.
By Tyler R. Johnson, Kian Ben-Jacob, Christopher P. Muller, Ramin Bostanabad
The paper introduces BO-pro-c, a Bayesian optimisation algorithm that employs a product-of-experts Gaussian process (GP-pro-c) as its surrogate model. GP-pro-c combines multiple local GP experts to improve uncertainty quantification, reduce computational cost, and preserve global correlations, addressing the cubic complexity of single global GP models. Experiments show that BO-pro-c achieves competitive optimisation performance with a 0.9% lower simple regret and a 39.4% reduction in computational overhead compared to a single‑global‑GP baseline.
By Yean Hoon Ong
arXiv:2603. 02159v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Instrumental variable (IV) and proximal causal learning (Proxy) methods are central frameworks for causal inference in the presence of unobserved confounding.
By Yuqi Zhang, Krikamol Muandet, Dino Sejdinovic, Edwin Fong, Siu Lun Chau
arXiv:2512. 06143v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Despite a large corpus of recent work on scaling up Gaussian processes, a stubborn trade-off between computational speed, prediction and uncertainty quantification accuracy, and customizability persists.
By Marcus M. Noack, Mark D. Risser, Hengrui Luo, Vardaan Tekriwal, Ronald J. Pandolfi
arXiv:2605. 10285v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We present a theoretically grounded Gaussian process framework that leverages neural feature maps to construct expressive kernels.
By Anthony Stephenson
arXiv:2511. 16340v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Efficient Gaussian process (GP) inference is critical for sequential decision-making tasks such as active learning, online prediction, and Bayesian optimization.
By Alan Yufei Dong, Jihao Andreas Lin, Jos\'e Miguel Hern\'andez-Lobato
arXiv:2606. 31063v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Gaussian process inference is often limited by cubic computational costs, a challenge that becomes more pronounced in spatio-temporal settings where posterior inference is required over dense grids.
By Rui-Yang Zhang, Lachlan Astfalck, Edward Cripps, David Leslie, Henry Moss
arXiv:2608. 16606v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Outliers can substantially distort Gaussian process regression (GPR) due to its conventional Gaussian observation likelihood, leading to inaccurate model learning and prediction.
By Arslan Majal, Aamir Hussain Chughtai