arXiv AI
Jun 6
Benchmark Everything Everywhere All at Once
arXiv:2606. 06462v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Benchmarks are fundamental for evaluating and advancing LLMs and MLLMs by providing standardized and explicit measures of performance.
The Race between Agentic AI Capabilities and Data Quality Control in Online Surveys
Related stories
arXiv AI
Jun 15
An Agentic Retrieval Framework for Autonomous Context-Aware Data Quality Assessment
arXiv:2606. 13692v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Data quality assessment is a critical prerequisite for effective data analytics and data-driven decision-making, yet it remains a challenging task due to the inherently context-dependent nature of data quality.
arXiv AI
Aug 3
Tool Specifications Matter: Uncovering and Mitigating Safety Risks in AI Agents
arXiv:2607. 29254v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI agents extend large language models (LLMs) with external tools, enabling them to perform complex tasks and translate model outputs into consequential real-world actions.
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 15
AgentCompass: A Unified Evaluation Infrastructure for Agent Capabilities
As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents, the need for unified evaluation infrastructure becomes critical. However, current evaluation pipelines remain highly fragmented and tightly coupled, hindering reproducibility and causing redundant engineering.
arXiv AI
Aug 3
OpenClaw and Ollama in Agentic AI: Toward Fully Autonomous and Scalable AI Agent Systems
arXiv:2607. 28629v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid transition from reactive large language models (LLMs) to persistent, action-capable systems has exposed critical gaps in the architectural understanding of Agentic AI, particularly in separating inference, orchestration, and execution layers for autonomous AI agents.
arXiv AI
Sep 10
DAREBench: Deployment-Aware and Reliable Evaluation of Models as Agents
arXiv:2609.06059v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As large language models evolve from question-answering systems into general-purpose agents, evaluation must move beyond static answer correctness to a...
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28
Agent Seer: Synthesizing Scenarios from Specification Understanding
Agent Seer is a pipeline that automatically synthesizes realistic evaluation scenarios for AI agents that use external tools, using only the tool’s specification (function names, natural‑language descriptions, and typed parameter schemas). Starting from a single Model Context Protocol (MCP) specification, it enriches raw schemas, generates graded scenarios with synthetic tool outputs, and expands them into mock‑data‑grounded multi‑turn dialogues that demonstrate strong tool‑calling correctness and conversational coherence. Across seven diverse MCP specifications, the pipeline achieves high quality, with parameter‑schema complexity emerging as the main driver of quality variation and argument‑value accuracy identified as the dominant failure mode.
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1
FocusAgent: Simple Yet Effective Ways of Trimming the Large Context of Web Agents
arXiv:2510.03204v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Web agents powered by large language models (LLMs) must process lengthy web page observations to complete user goals; these pages often exceed tens...
arXiv AI
Jul 16
AgentCompass: A Unified Evaluation Infrastructure for Agent Capabilities
arXiv:2607. 13705v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into autonomous agents, the need for unified evaluation infrastructure becomes critical.
arXiv AI
Jun 6
Search-Time Contamination in Deep Research Agents: Measuring Performance Inflation in Public Benchmark Evaluation
arXiv:2606. 05241v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Public benchmarks enable fair and reproducible evaluation of LLM reasoning, but they become fragile for deep research agents that actively search the web during inference.
arXiv AI
Sep 1
AgenTRIM: Tool Risk Mitigation for Agentic AI
arXiv:2601.12449v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: AI agents are autonomous systems that combine LLMs with external tools to solve complex tasks. While such tools extend capability, improper t...
arXiv AI
Aug 7
Benchmarking the Benchmarks: Evaluating Benchmarks for Conversational Agents
arXiv:2608. 06329v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Task-oriented conversational agents are evaluated using curated or automatically generated benchmarks, yet benchmark quality is rarely assessed.