The paper investigates how the representation of tool interfaces—referred to as a tool schema—affects the performance of large language model agents. By systematically transforming a native tool schema with nine operators, the authors demonstrate that agents exhibit significant variability in success rates across different but functionally equivalent schema variants, a phenomenon they call schema bias. Experiments on eleven LLMs, including closed models, reveal that success can range from complete failure to 97% solely due to schema differences, and that training only mitigates bias when the specific variant is included in the training data.
By Yinhong Liu, Zhili Tan, Zilin Wang, Zhijiang Guo
arXiv:2607. 17948v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent-based models (ABMs) rely on simple, explicit and reproducible rules for individual decision making, while complex collective behavior emerges from interactions among agents.
By Stefano Blando, Emanuele Guerrazzi, Riccardo Porcedda, Giuseppe Squillace, Max Tschaikowski, Andrea Vandin
The paper introduces JAZ, a minimalist LLM agent framework that centers on a single primitive called “invoke”, which allows an LLM to write and execute arbitrary code, including recursive calls, while treating all inputs and interaction history as variables in the code environment. JAZ provides built‑in hooks for constraints and monitoring but relies solely on prompting, without external tools, memory systems, or file‑system access. Experiments show that JAZ “invoke” outperforms specialized external harnesses such as Letta (MemGPT) and ACE on long‑horizon recall tasks and continual self‑improvement, achieving higher accuracy at lower cost.
By Zhening Li, Joshua Liu, Mateja Vukelic, Nicole Shen, Supriya Lall, Amitayush Thakur, Alex Zhang, Omar Khattab, Jonathan Light, Armando Solar-Lezama
arXiv:2607. 25816v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model agents often spend substantial wall-clock time waiting for tool call results.
By Jiabao Ji, Yujian Liu, Li An, Rohit Jain, Gungor Polatkan, Siyu Zhu, Shiyu Chang
arXiv:2512. 13278v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Agentic reinforcement learning has advanced large language models (LLMs) to reason through long chain-of-thought trajectories while interleaving external tool use.
By Jiaru Zou, Ling Yang, Yunzhe Qi, Sirui Chen, Mengting Ai, Ke Shen, Jingrui He, Mengdi Wang
arXiv:2608. 03327v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hybrid computer-use agents can act through screenshots or call text tools.
By Siqi Fan, Minghao Li, Xiaoqian Ma, Wenhui Tan, Xiusheng Huang, Juntong Wu, Liujie Zhang, Shuo Shang, Weihang Chen
The paper introduces Belief-Calibrated Optimization (BCO), a method that records and updates a persistent in‑context document representing an agent’s belief about how the environment responds to edits. By continually revising this world model as new candidates are evaluated, BCO improves the performance of frozen LLM agents across five benchmarks, outperforming a control lacking the world model. An offline ablation shows that the document’s content provides reusable, accurate predictions of environmental responses, beyond mere form.
By Yuhan Chen, Zhihua Tian, Mahavir Dabas, Charith Peris, Rahul Gupta, Ming Jin, Feiyang Kang, Siyuan Zhang, Nan Wang, Ruoxi Jia
The paper investigates how reinforcement learning can cause large language model agents to adopt shortcut policies for tool use, relying on superficial prompt cues rather than actual task needs. By creating synthetic environments that mix factual QA and math reasoning, the authors show that agents often invoke tools when cues are present, even when those tools are unnecessary, with spurious invocation rates rising up to 39%. They find that shortcut learning occurs mainly when agents have already mastered the target tool and that semantic alignment between cues and tools amplifies the effect. To counter this, they propose a dense, decision-level reward where an LLM judge assesses tool necessity, which reduces cue-driven tool use while maintaining performance.
By Yiwei Yang, Haoxiang Zhang, Bingbing Wen, Yao Lu, Yuchen Wu, Lei Zhang, Julian McAuley, Pan Lu, Bill Howe
arXiv:2607. 10059v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agent systems based on large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed for autonomous tasks, yet existing evaluations mostly focus on task success rather than whether agents know when to abstain.
By Xun Liu, Yi Evie Zhang, Vira Kasprova, Parisa Rabbani, Pardis Sadat Zahraei, Tianyu Zhang, Ali Ebrahimpour-Boroojeny, Varun Chandrasekaran
Agentic language models must learn when to call tools, when to consume tool responses, and when to answer directly. This makes multi-teacher on-policy distillation a natural training strategy: one teacher can specialize in tool calls, another in direct responses, and the student can learn from both on its own generated distribution.
arXiv:2606. 28733v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents are expected to act over multiple turns, using search, browsing interfaces, and terminal tools to complete user goals.
By Han Luo, Bingbing Wen, Lucy Lu Wang
The paper introduces Tool Primitives, a design that replaces rigid API schemas with natural language interfaces for tool calling, enabling seamless inter-tool communication. It builds ToolFace, a repository of over 25,000 functions that LLMs can dynamically retrieve, and HEART, a harness engineering framework that orchestrates tool use with planning, routing, and verification. Experiments show HEART outperforms fine‑tuned models and leading commercial LLMs while cutting API costs by up to 85%.
By Haibo Jin, Suijin Wang, Xucheng Yu, Haojing Luo, Haohan Wang